Share This Page

Review: 'Anchorman 2' an improv-ment over first go 'round

| Tuesday, Dec. 17, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
This image released by Paramount Pictures shows Paul Rudd as Brian Fantana, Will Ferrell as Ron Burgundy, David Koechner as Champ Kind and Steve Carell as Brick Tamland in a scene from 'Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues.'

The blow-dried hair, the polyester suits and '70s-style political incorrectness and facial hair are back in “Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues.” The buffoonery goes epic in this sillier-than-silly sequel, a comedy overfilled with funny people trying to one-up one another on the set in the classic “best line wins” school of comic improvisation.

But darned if “The Legend Continues” isn't also a sometimes on-the-money commentary on 24-hour news. “Anchorman 2” suggests the notion — if there's a live car chase, a celebrity behaving badly or a cute critter story “trending,” it's what TV should cover — originated with Ron Burgundy (Will Ferrell): “Why do we have to tell people what they need to know? Why can't we just tell them what they want to hear?”

That might be the sanest thing Burgundy says, after he's gotten his “team” (Paul Rudd, Steve Carell and David Koechner) back together and landed them all gigs at a new Australian-owned cable news start-up in the dark days of 1980 New York.

Ron needs sports bigot Champ Kind (Koechner), investigative ladies man Brian Fantana (Rudd) and weather nerd Brick Tamland (Carell) so that he can fulfill his destiny, to “have salon-quality hair and read the news.”

He's lost his wife (Christina Applegate) and an anchor played by Harrison Ford has run him out of the business. But cable offers them all another shot. If only they can get the better of anchor bully Jack Lime (James Marsden). If only Brick's high-pitched voice doesn't betray half a dozen nervous disorders with a touch of Asperger's Syndrome.

Ron's got to get a handle on having a black boss (Meagan Good, bringing it) and his wife having a shrink for a beau (Greg Kinnear). Brian has to get over the money and women he gave up as a pet fashion photographer to return to news. Champ has to adjust to the TV sportscasts showing nothing but home runs. And Brick's got to find someplace, other than the office vending machine, to take the daft office receptionist (Kristen Wiig) he wants to date.

You can tell the old pros from the novices, with Carell blurting out random noises and words and scoring snickers every time he opens his mouth. His scenes with Wiig are rough-hewn exercises in improv — each waiting to react to whatever unexpected burp comes out. Applegate, a veteran of “Anchorman,” holds her own. Folks like Kinnear, Ford and Marsden settle for just doing their lines, trying to keep a straight face.

And Ferrell is the same bundle of comic energy he's shown himself to be. The whole cast, but Ferrell especially, hurl so much at the wall that many of the best bits from the movie's many TV commercials are nowhere to be found in the finished film.

Not all of them work, and the story tilts so heavily toward Ferrell that if you aren't a fan, you have no business paying to see two hours of his tomfoolery. The finale, leaving no cameo unturned, is a dud.

But “Anchorman 2” proves that you don't have to be a fine wine to age well. Even a cheap Burgundy can get the job done.

Roger Moore is a staff writer for McClatchy-Tribune News Service.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.