Oaks Theater's 'Bad Movie Nite!' dares audience to endure flops
By R.A. Monti
Published: Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
Sometimes, a bad movie can be just as much, if not more, fun as a highly acclaimed film.
At least, that's what the Oaks Theater hopes with its monthly “Bad Movie Nite!”
“It's always a B, C, sometimes D movie,” manager Adam Morgan says. “(They're so bad), most of the time, people haven't heard of them.”
Morgan said the theater has been having “Bad Movie Nite!” or BMN, since October. The next installment is 10 p.m. Jan. 17 and 18.
“The movie's always a mystery,” Morgan says. “People always come in and ask me what we're going to show. I tell them, ‘half the fun is the surprise.'
It doesn't matter what the movie is. Whatever the movie is, it's going to be a lot of fun.”
Morgan says he can't even reveal what movies were shown in the past.
Each film is preceded by a compilation of bad home movies, educational films and other shorts, that, Morgan says, are intended to engage the audience before the main feature starts.
“Bad Movie Nite!” is spawned from http://www.facebook.com/BadMovieNite .
“They pick the movies,” Morgan says. “Everyone tries suggesting movies to me, but they have to do that to them.”
Morgan says that it's the audience that makes “Bad Movie Nite!”
“It's a real communal experience,” he says. “Everyone's in the same room having a good time. We want the audience to enhance the experience.”
R. A. Monti is a contributing writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Jude Law struts his dark side in ‘Dom’
- ‘Skin’ has a lot going on underneath
- ‘Transcendence’ stuck in tropes
- Get up close and personal with cute ‘Bears’
- ‘Haunted House 2’ is too much of a bad thing
- Fonda, Greenwood join cast of ‘Fathers and Daughters’
- Review: ‘Heaven Is for Real’ has a relatable view of family issues