Share This Page

'Words' sticks out tongue at comedy tropes

| Thursday, March 27, 2014, 8:55 p.m.

The problem with “Bad Words,” to the extent that there is one, is that, like its protagonist, it tries too hard.

In the overall scheme of things, that's not such a bad thing.

Jason Bateman has become one of the most dependable straight men around. In “Arrested Development” he was the often-hapless good guy, trying, with hilariously poor results, to keep his dysfunctional family together. He's played a variation on that role in films, but not here. In “Bad Words,” he provides the insanity himself.

In his debut as a director, Bateman plays the bad guy, the foul-mouthed, over-aged spelling-bee participant. For mysterious reasons, he insists on competing in the annual competition, to the frustration and, sometimes, humiliation, of his wee opponents and, especially, their parents.

To be clear: This is humor, in a script by Andrew Dodge, of the scorched-earth variety. Nothing is sacred. Much of it is offensive, on purpose. Either you agree that this establishes Bateman's character, Guy Trilby, as a deeply disturbed man with a pretty wicked sense of humor, or you get offended by him telling an Indian child to “shut your curry hole.” It's played for revealing laughs or it isn't. Bateman, wisely, leaves this up to you to decide.

Guy insists upon competing and won't tell anyone why, not even the online reporter Jenny Widgeon (Kathryn Hahn), whose website is sponsoring his run (and footing the bill).

Guy, who evidently knows how to spell every word ever created with ease, exploits a loophole in the competition's bylaws, something about his status as not having advanced past the eighth grade making him eligible. No one can kick him out, not even the long-ago former champion and perturbed director of the competition, Dr. Bernice Deagan (Allison Janney, hilarious). Though it's not for lack of trying.

Along the way, a kid, Chaitanya (Rohan Chand), another competitor, tries mightily to befriend Guy. Guy takes the boy on a whirlwind tour of bad behaviors, including cursing, drinking and having a prostitute expose herself to him.

Again, where this falls on your personal line between funny and abusive may vary.

Either way, what makes the comedy work is that Bateman doesn't relent. Guy is, simply, a loathsome person.

Alas, he can't stay that way forever. There has to be some way out for Guy. And Bateman and Dodge try to make the transition seem believable.

But it comes off more as an attempt to appease the audience than anything else. You can't please everyone with a film like this, so you're better off not trying to.

Bill Goodykoontz writes for the Arizona Republic.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.