'Jeremy Kost: Friends with Benefits' looks at Pittsburgh 'queens'
The exhibit “Jeremy Kost: Friends with Benefits,” which opened last month in conjunction with the Andy Warhol Museum's “Naughty-or-Nice Holiday Bash” hosted by Pittsburgh's own drag queen extraordinaire Sharon Needles, is anything but a drag, even though Pittsburgh's drag queens are the focus.
Pittsburgh's drag scene has grown in recent years to reach national attention, thanks, in part, to Sharon Needles winning this year's season 4 of “RuPaul's Drag Race” on Logo TV.
So, it's no wonder that Kost, a tireless chronicler of gender, sexuality and nightlife, would focus his camera on the likes of Needles, Marsha Monster Mellow, Veruca La'Piranha, Heidi Glum and Cherri Baum, all drag queens who take center stage in elaborate photo collages made from dozens of Polaroid pictures.
That's right, Polaroid. That quick fix for shutterbugs over the second half of the 20th century, in which you snap a photo and out comes your picture in an instant. Polaroid may have put the instant in instant camera, but, thanks to digital photography, that's ancient history now. Polaroid produced its last lot of instant film in February 2008.
“All of the Polaroids in the exhibition expired in 2009,” Kost says from his car, on the way to a gym in Los Angeles. “They're all real Polaroids. Every single image in that show is what I tend to refer to as ‘dead stock.' ”
At 35, Kost is a rising star in the art world. A native of Corpus Christi, Texas, he splits his time between Los Angeles and New York City. The latter is where he met Warhol director Eric Shiner in 2006. And since 2008, he has been chronicling Pittsburgh's drag queens in his own inimitable way.
“All of the collages are unique objects,” he says, with the piece “Friends with Benefits: Communing with Andy” being the largest and most ambitious.
It features all of the aforementioned drag queens surrounding Warhol's grave in a Bethel Park cemetery, along with Brigid Berlin, artist and former Warhol “superstar.”
“When Brigid Berlin had her show at the Warhol a few years ago, we all went to Andy's grave together,” Kost says. “It was actually Brigid's first time visiting the gravesite since they buried him.”
Kost says the title of the piece, as well as the title of the exhibit, is a play on words. Whereas, “friends with benefits” has a sexual connotation, he sees it as having a more “friend-oriented” aspect.
“In a weird way, I thought it was an interesting play on the way these kids have a relationship together,” he says. “Not in a sexual sense. But they are part of this tight-knit family, of sorts. In essence, being this sort of dysfunctional family of drag queens who have known each other for so long and really have been, for all intents and purposes, building blocks for each other. They've all sort of learned from each other and come up together. I find it really fascinating.”
Not necessarily part of a series, Kost says the pieces in this show fit in with multiple bodies of work he has been working on that deal with gender, body issues, forms of transformation and identities built around transformation and deconstruction.
“I used to be 250 pounds and now I weigh about 170,” he says. “So, most of my life story develops around being a really heavy guy and sort of developing from there … my own discomfort with my own body and such.”
“These collages sort of deconstruct and re-contextualize and sort of compartmentalize,” he says. “As a whole, I'm OK with where my body is now at this point. I take care of myself quite a bit. But that's a big part of what the work is about, this question of transformation whether it's permanent — vis-a-vis transsexuals — or this sort of drag queen that becomes a character, whether it's for a night or an afternoon for a photo shoot.”
Kurt Shaw is the art critic for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.