Group supported by Hillman Foundation zooms in on today's photography
The Carnegie Museum of Art is putting a sharper focus on the ever-changing world of photography with a new initiative analyzing what the art form means in today's world.
“The initiative positions the museum to be a leader in a subject area with broad appeal and profound relevance to contemporary society,” says Lynn Zelevansky, museum director.
Supported by funding from the William T. Hillman Foundation, the Hillman Photography Initiative will examine the state of photography today, when technological innovations make it easier to take photographs and share them instantaneously.
“What is photography today? How are people using it? There isn't one answer,” program manager Divya Rao Heffley says. “The excitement is in the conversation.”
The project is the result of two years of research, discussion and development. Heffley was hired to explore the wide world of photography in all its manifestations — everything from installations to the kind of photos people take with their cell phones, what satellites are capturing, even the Google Street View cars. It became clear there were people from many different fields asking questions about what this all means.
“Photography means something different to everyone who uses it,” Heffley says.
Five agents will drive the project:
• Carnegie Museum of Art curator Tina Kukielski
• Marvin Heiferman, independent curator and writer
•Alex Klein, program curator at the Institute of Contemporary Art, Philadelphia
• Illah Nourbakhsh, professor of robotics and director of the CREATE Lab, Carnegie Mellon University
• Arthur Ou, assistant professor of photography and director, BFA photography, Parsons The New School for Design
After each 12-month cycle, two of the positions will be filled with new contributors to allow for new perspectives.
“Every year, we hope to be answering these questions,” Heffley says. “I don't think there's one answer. They will be answered over and over again in new ways.”
The group will meet for the first time April 21 and 22 to begin the development cycle. They'll spend three months working with Heffley to identify a key theme that will inspire a wide range of activities such as exhibitions, programs, collaborations, publications, commissioned works of art, artist residencies and online experiences.
“The agents will decide how they want it to manifest,” Heffley says. “It might be a mobile app or an online initiative or something that's never been inside the four walls of the museum. It might not even be within the four walls.”
Nathan Martin of the innovation/design studio Deeplocal will facilitate the process. The public can track progress at initiative.cmoa.org.
“This really is for everybody,” Heffley says.
Rachel Weaver is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7948 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.