Share This Page

A passion for the void: Artists take different paths into emptiness

| Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 8:10 p.m.
Lindsay Merrill
'My Lead Balloon' by Lindsay Merrill
Paul Rouphail
'Evening in Miraflores' by Paul Rouphail
Paul Rouphail
'Bus Ride II' by Paul Rouphail
Paul Rouphail
'Sunday, 3pm' by Paul Rouphail
Lindsay Merrill
'Exit I' by Lindsay Merrill

As realistic and exacting to detail as they are, the paintings of Lindsay Merrill and Paul Rouphail on display at 707 Penn Gallery, Downtown, are still missing something. It may take awhile to realize what it is, until it hits you — that something is you.

Both recent graduates of Carnegie Mellon University (Merrill in 2009 and Rouphail in 2010), they may be young, but both are masters at capturing moments frozen in time, literally as tableau, as though the curtain had just gone up on a real world, void of people, just waiting for you to show up.

That's especially true of Rouphail's paintings, which focus on architecture and landscape common to bird- and people-watchers. This gives the experience of looking at them the mildly pleasurable feeling of seeing while being unnoticed, as if a ghost moving through a literal world unnoticed.

Here, the conflict between tradition and progress in both rural and urban settings, and the moods evoked by time of day, create a perpetual fantasy world that is closely aligned with our own. In “Flight Over a Small City” progress, represented by an airplane in the sky high above, looms over the past, represented by a pre-war apartment building.

The landscapes that accompany Rouphail's urban images are an attempt to further propagate this sense of perpetual fantasy by suggesting the boundlessness of the flat horizon, as in “Bus Ride I” and “Bus Ride II,” in which the great expanse of the American Midwest is captured in hill upon rolling hill.

In “Sunday, 3pm,” Pittsburgh is the likely backdrop, and as the title suggests, the streets are eerily void of people. This gives this image of a very ordinary and recognizable place an overwhelming sense of mystery and power. With the foreground filled with a gray expanse of concrete street and sidewalk, and long streaks of raking shadow cast by building upon building reflected in empty, standardized windows, you realize you are in the real world but a stranger world than you imagined.

Earlier works, such as “Neighborhood by the Ocean” and “Evening in Miraflores” were painted during time Rouphail and Merrill (the two are a couple) spent in Lima, Peru, in 2011.

In “Evening in Miraflores,” a large billboard silhouette of the Marlboro Man is set against a sea of monotonous apartment buildings, suggesting a fabricated romance that pops in and around facades in many of the city paintings. They are fantasies enveloped in further fantasy.

“Walking around Lima, one can feel that he or she is experiencing a sort of cultural collision or synthesis,” Rouphail says. “I'm still trying to find a poignant way to talk about my experience there and the subsequent paintings that I have produced.”

In a way, the congregation of distinct images from both artists' bodies of work suggest this feeling of cultural collision in a similar manner. Each painting, though thematically and technically linked to one another, seems autonomous; each individual painting speaks only to itself.

Merrill's “Exit” series continues this trend of autonomy and isolation. By appropriating photos taken of skydivers exiting aircraft and omitting all human subjects, the “Exit” paintings, at first glance, mislead the viewer, suggesting that the planes are crashing toward the ground.

Only on closer inspection of the images does the viewer realize the absence of a horizon line and open or absent aircraft doors. These suggest, in fact, that the perspective is of the contrary: It is the viewer who is falling.

The cropping of the image and omission of text or detailing on the planes' extremities, compounded with the lack of any real physical reference (no horizon line), accentuate a sense of vertigo and enclosure.

It is only in the two “My Lead Balloon” paintings, where another plane, submerged in water, is presented fully within the boundaries of the image, that the landscape has been restored. Vertigo is now replaced by symmetry and order.

Merrill writes in her statement that these paintings are an attempt to “examine the nature of collective and personal narratives through the appropriation of family photographs.”

“They are perhaps, more specifically, an ode to my father,” Merrill says, “an excellent pilot and a survivor of things both miraculous and devastating.”

This is not realism, but the scenes depicted are intensely real, as if vignettes frozen in time that are eerily void yet full of sensory experience.

Kurt Shaw is the art critic for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at kshaw@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.