ShareThis Page

Silver Eye exhibit captures the raw space of defunct furnaces in Rankin

| Wednesday, Aug. 21, 2013, 7:32 p.m.
Silver Eye Center for Photography
Alexis Dillon, A Bridge Too Far, 2012
Silver Eye Center for Photography
Ivette Spradlin, Ashley by the Carrie Furnace in Rankin, PA, 2011
© Scott Goildsmith 2012
Carrie Furnace in Braddock PA
Silver Eye Center for Photography
Ohad Cadji, Molten Metal Express, 2013
Silver Eye Center for Photography
Kevin Tomasic, Hills, Stoves, and Sky, 2013
Silver Eye Center for Photography
David Kissell, Molten Trough, 2012
Silver Eye Center for Photography
Becky Zahn, Broken, 2011

If you can't bring the people to the crucible, bring the crucible to the people.

The exhibit “Carrie Furnaces: Contemporary Views” at Silver Eye Center for Photography on the South Side features 51 photographs by 32 photographers taken at Carrie Furnace, the historic blast furnace site located in Rankin.

Defunct since 1978, the Carrie Furnaces were built in 1884 across the river from the Homestead Steel Works. All that is left of the site now are remnants of buildings and furnaces No. 6 and No. 7, which operated from 1907 to 1978.

The furnaces have since been designated a National Historic Landmark (2006). But few go there. Part of the reason is that it is still very much raw space, as visitors to this exhibit will surely come to recognize in photographs that feature lots of rusted metal and graffiti-covered walls.

“Carrie Furnace is a spectacle. It is mysterious,” says photography instructor Ivette Spradlin, who has been leading fellow photographers, novice and professional, to the site on what she calls “photo safaris” since August 2011. She also has taken her classes from Carnegie Mellon University and Pittsburgh Filmmakers there on field trips.

All of the photos in the exhibit came from an open call for entries held by Silver Eye from June through July. A total of 332 photographs were submitted by 77 photographers, most of whom had followed Spradlin through the site.

The grounds are massive and hard to cover in less than three hours. So, Spradlin says giving fellow safarigoers some direction and helping them keep in mind some intention was essential for a productive session.

“I often tell students or participants to think of one word that they think of when they look at Carrie Furnace, and let that word guide them while photographing there,” Spradlin says. “Their words are often something like: old, historic, industrial, huge, transforming, manmade, deteriorating, abandonment, progress, rust, or even shadow and Ironhorse.”

Spradlin says all of those words describe the furnaces, and they are without a doubt the reasons why so many are drawn to photographing it.

For example, both Howard Grill's “Carrie Furnace II” (2011) and David Kissell's “Molten Trough” (2012) take visitors into the belly of the beast, playing up the massive scale of Furnace No. 7 through views that are up-close and seemingly personal.

Brad Fetchin takes this notion even further with “The Haunt” (2013), for in it he has captured a stream of light flowing through one of the troughs leading out of the furnace, like the molten slag that once ran there.

And Kevin Tomasic shows the massive cooling towers that flank the furnace in “Hills, Stoves, and Sky” (2013).

Spradlin says people also are interested in documenting the ways the site has been or is being transformed and repurposed. The graffti-covered walls are captured in several shots by Becky Zahn, and Rob Schwerdt's “Deer Face” (2011) features a 45- by 35-foot antlered deer head completed by Industrial Arts Co-op in October 1998 from recycled materials found on the site.

Some of the pieces are set further afield, such as Ohad Cadji's “Molten Metal Express” (2013), which features a railcar that once carried molten metal over to the Homestead site, now sitting abandoned in a field.

Spradlin says that many of her fellow photographers think of Carrie Furnace as a link to our past, “in particular Pittsburgh's past, and, for some visitors, it plays a part in their own family's narrative,” she says.

That's obvious in Scott Goldsmith's “Time Stopped” (2012), which shows a broken time-clock where workers once punched in to begin their shifts, as well as photographs by Ryan Keene and Robert G. Myers, which feature a pair of goggles and a hard hat respectively.

“Many people photograph to ‘capture' something, to possess it, to call it their own, and to feel connected to and a part of something larger than themselves,” Spradlin says. “Carrie offers a multitude of ways to reflect, it is historical, it is political, it is ominous and awe-inspiring, and although it has been stripped of its original purpose, it continues to evolve.”

The show culminates with Spradlin's own piece, “Ashley by the Carrie Furnace in Rankin, PA” (2011), which at 40 by 50 inches is the largest in the exhibit. It features an overall view of the site, as seen from a path leading up to it. On the path is a young woman, a friend of Spradlin who is completing a doctorate degree at Carnegie Mellon.

“In the summer of 2010, someone had taken me down to that spot to pick up colorful pieces of glass for me to use in a mosaic,” Spradlin says. “I had never been inside Carrie Furnace when I photographed Ashley there. At that time, Carrie Furnace represented something that seemed to exemplify a part of Pittsburgh's landscape to me. The Carrie Furnace didn't have the meaning that it holds with me today after having learned so much about it. At the time, it was an element of the landscape, something strong, powerful, and mysterious, like the train going by, and like Ashley.”

Kurt Shaw is the art critic for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.