Art Review: 'Charlotte Dumas: Anima' at Silver Eye Center for Photography
The exhibit “Charlotte Dumas: Anima” at South Side's Silver Eye Center for Photography features several large-scale photographs of the majestic burial horses at Arlington National Cemetery after a long day.
These close-range portraits show the horses in their respective stalls as they lay down to sleep. The images capture these otherwise intimidating animals in tender moments, with eyes slowly drooping, muscles relaxing and their whole being given over to sleep.
The Army horses — which belong to the Old Guard, the 3rd Infantry Regiment — are used to take soldiers to their final resting place in traditional military funerals.
Drawing inspiration from the classical portrait paintings of the 17th-century Dutch Golden Age, Dumas photographed them from 2010 to 2012, exploring the relationship between her subjects and their environment.
Commissioned by the Corcoran Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., this exhibit, organized by Julie Saul Gallery, New York, and Silver Eye, has a look and feel as if walking through a stable of horses, depicting each horse submerged in darkness.
Dumas was born in 1977 in Vlaardingen, Netherlands. She graduated from the Gerrit Rietveld Academie in Amsterdam in 2000 and continued her education at the Rijksakademie from 2001 to '02. Her work has been included in many group exhibits and solo shows in the Netherlands, Italy, France and the United States.
For Dumas, who splits her time between Amsterdam and New York City, animals have been one of her main subjects for several years. In 2011, she photographed search-and-rescue dogs that worked at Ground Zero, four images of which are on display in this exhibit. Since 2005, she has been taking portraits of wolves, horses, dogs and tigers. An example of the latter is also on view.
She has done this with purpose.
“The disappearance of animals in our daily lives as part of society has a tremendous impact, I believe, on how we experience life and how we process and reflect on the things that happen around us,” she says. “Once there was a broad variety of interaction with (working) animals that wasn't like the more common relations as we know now — kept as pets or used as meat.”
In her view, animals were much more needed in the past while they also offered solace and companionship.
Dumas believes the way we look at animals tells us about ourselves.
“The portraits of the horses in Arlington seen at night laying down resting, away from their laden task, become also just horses again,” she says. “Spending time watching them drift in and out of sleep felt like witnessing a most vulnerable moment, with their large legs folded underneath and their big heads tilting on the stable floor, they feel like friendly giants to me.”
In the back of the gallery, a short video shows several of the horses slowly settling into slumber. In one stall, a horse rolls back onto its side, as though pushed, as it falls into deep sleep. It's a moment of exhaustion that is completely relatable between animals and humans.
“When rolling over, their figure is no longer vertical and majestic but fragile and sometimes awkwardly looking, with their bellies sticking up,” Dumas says.
“The context in which I portray my subjects keeps changing, and although I meet new characters every time, some of which I'm more drawn to than others, their animal behavior is universal.”
Having since completed another series featuring the wild horses of Nevada, Dumas says that one of the wild horses in her most recent video “The Widest Prairies” lays down just like that horse at Arlington.
“I enjoy seeing the different series in light of each other.”
Kurt Shaw is the art critic for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.