Nuns replace 'Fifty Shades' atop classical albums chart
For the past month, the world of classical music has seen fewer shades of grey and more black and white.
Since its release in mid-November, “Advent at Ephesus,” a collection of a cappella music sung by Benedictine nuns, has topped Billboard's traditional classical albums chart — displacing the companion CD of classical themes for E.L. James' novel “Fifty Shades of Grey.”
The Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles, cloistered at Our Lady of Ephesus priory in rural Gower, Mo., have sold 22,000 copies of a collection of hymns, chants and polyphony that celebrates the anticipation of the birth of Jesus. The album has placed as high as No. 4 on the overall classical albums chart, which puts the nuns on track to become 2012's top-selling new classical act.
The sisters follow the monastic rule of fourth-century Christian saint Benedict of Nursia and sing eight times a day in their chapel, led by their prioress .
“It's not like a group that just gets together and rehearses a few times a week. They're really as one,” says Monica Fitzgibbons, co-founder of the label De Montfort Music, which released “Advent at Ephesus.” “They sing more than they actually speak.”
The album initially topped the traditional classical chart thanks to a grass-roots marketing effort focused on the faith-based community and the classical-choral audience.
After the sisters unseated the “Fifty Shades of Grey” album, places like National Public Radio's “All Things Considered” program and People magazine introduced their unadorned music to a wider audience.
The sisters haven't paid attention to their coup of knocking the “Fifty Shades of Grey” compilation from the top of the chart. “They don't even know what (‘Grey') is,” Fitzgibbons says.
Brian Mansfield is a contributing writer for USA Today.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.