Share This Page

Freakwater's approach a bit like musical moonshine

| Wednesday, Jan. 16, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Freakwater Credit: Freakwater

Updated 15 hours ago

When a band picks a name as distinctive and weird as Freakwater, there ought to be a story behind it.

“It's just a made-up word,” explains Catherine Ann Irwin, one of Freakwater's pair of strikingly dissimilar singer/songwriters. “We had in mind that it should be like Crazy Horse, in that it's two words (though it wasn't.) Then people said that it did mean something, that it was a word for moonshine.”

If that's true, it's almost too perfect for a band that actually sounds like a sonic distillation of the most potent moonshine ever brewed secretly in a backwoods still.

“I have a Google Alert for (online mentions of) Freakwater,” says Janet Beveridge Bean, Freakwater's other prime mover. “It's always telling me when there's a ‘freak water' accident somewhere.”

Between moonshine and freak accidents, you actually get a pretty good idea of the territory Freakwater travels. They'll be in Pittsburgh this Thursday, on a tour celebrating the 20th anniversary and re-release of their seminal album, “Feels Like the Third Time.”

When they started making music in Louisville, Ky., in 1989, they were pretty much all alone. The only quasi-genre that could (sort of) hold them, “alt-country,” didn't yet exist. It was just weird, stripped-down mountain music that was too dark, too raw, too strange for the dwindling audience of old-timers and ex-hippies who still bought folk music at the time. It was like using the plot of “Justified” when people expected “The Beverly Hillbillies.”

Luckily, there was Thrill Jockey Records in Chicago, who were best known for noisy experimental rock. Bean also was part of the Neil Young-ish rock band Eleventh Dream Day, which released an album on the label.

Freakwater's songs often descend into dark places, dwelling on things like drunken misery and revenge. No amount of processed Nashville gloss could make songs like “Good for Nothing” (as in “I've been...”), and “Louisville Lip” — about Cassius Clay throwing his Olympic gold into the Ohio River in disgust, after being turned away from a restaurant in his hometown — fit for truck commercials.

But if there's not much happiness to be found in their music, at least they clearly enjoy each other's company and friendship.

Freakwater's appeal lies largely in its razor-sharp songwriting, and the stark contrast between the band members' voices. Musically, they're a deadly one-two punch combination. In conversation, they laugh a lot and frequently finish each other's jokes.

“I think it's often presented in magazines as Janet is purely good, and I'm purely evil,” Irwin says.

“A review of our show in New York once said my hair ‘was brushed too neatly and my clothes were ironed too nicely,' ” Bean says. “And Catherine, ‘looked like she'd shoot you off the back porch with a shotgun.' ”

“My mom would read that and be like, ‘Don't you have an iron?' ” Irwin says. “I can't believe that nice girl even wants to play with you.”

Bean's voice is often described as “angelic.” It seems that no one can describe Irwin's without referencing whiskey.

“Her voice may be whiskey-drenched, but her personality is like so sweet,” Bean says. “There's endless layers … like a tiramisu!”

“It's sedimentary,” Irwin says. “With some occasional fracking.”

Michael Machosky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at mmachosky@tribweb.com or 412-320-7901.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.