Review: Bach Choir, Charlie Chaplin blend well
Johann Sebastian Bach was not the soundtrack writer for Charlie Chaplin that John Williams is for Steven Spielberg, but with a little editing here and there, Thomas Wesley Douglas made it seem like he might be.
Douglas and the Bach Choir of Pittsburgh did a concert called “Time Zones” on April 6 and 7 in which he used a variety of Bach material as scores for four Chaplin shorts and the full-length “A Dog's Life.” The choir's artistic director diced and sliced the music and also turned some of the pieces into wordless vocals rather than using the original lyrics.
His construction of Bach's music in general fit the films well. For instance, the Fugue in D Major was an appropriate music machine over the conveyor belt finale of “Modern Times.”
As is often the case, Douglas' concerts can be a little out of the ordinary. In these, the four shorts were shown in the auditorium of the Allegheny Academy public school on the North Side while “A Dog's Life” was screened in the lobby. Audience members could choose what they wanted to see first and then go to the other site for the second half.
It was almost like changing classes on a school day. Aside from the somewhat uncomfortable seats, the style gave the concert an informality that seemed to fit with Chaplin.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.