Black Keys play to packed Consol Energy Center
The Flaming Lips perform Tuesday, April 30, 2013 at Consol Energy Center.
Photo by Jack Fordyce | Tribune-Review
The last time The Black Keys played a show in Pittsburgh was in 2010 at the Carnegie Mellon University Spring Carnival. Since then, a lot has happened for them.
They continued touring into 2011 for their sixth album, “Brothers,” performing on late night TV shows, headlining music festivals like Bonnaroo and Coachella, selling out two shows at Central Parks' Summer Stage festival and Madison Square Garden in less than 15 minutes.
“Brothers” has since sold more than 1.5 million copies worldwide, winning a Grammy Award for best alternative music album, along with best rock performance by a duo for the single “Tighten Up,” which spent 10 weeks No. 1 on Billboard's alternative music chart.
On April 30, they played to a packed Consol Energy Center, touring for their newest album, “El Camino,” which earlier this year won a Grammy for best rock album along with the best rock song and best rock performance for the hit single “Lonely Boy.”
The Pittsburgh show was cancelled on their last tour with The Kings of Leon, but was well worth the wait for fans to see them headline the show April 30 with The Flaming Lips. Gone are the days of playing free shows for students, that's for sure.
Jack Fordyce is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.