Review: RCA collection puts all Nilsson's music in one box
‘The RCA Albums Collection'
Harry Nilsson (RCA Legacy)
If diehard fans of the late, great Harry Nilsson rejoiced back in April with the release of the two-disc career-spanner “The Essential Nilsson,” then the latest Nilsson release, “The RCA Albums Collection,” just might make their heads explode. This 17-CD box set is the definitive Nilsson compilation and, believe it or not, worth every penny of its $120 asking price. The set includes 14 original albums recorded between 1967-77 expanded with 65 added tracks, plus three full discs of bonus material totaling another 58 tracks. Completists should take note that there are 55 previously unreleased tunes.
The remastered albums would be worth the investment by themselves, but when you throw in assorted demos, alternate versions of familiar Nilsson tunes, and some previously unearthed gems, it makes this one a no-brainer. Everything you could possibly want (and more) is here, including “Coconut,” “One,” “1941,” “Together,” “Rainmaker,” “Everybody's Talkin',” “I Guess the Lord Must Be in New York City,” “Good Old Desk,” “Without You” and “Turn on Your Radio.” Unless you have no life whatsoever, it'll take several days to get through “The RCA Albums Collection.” And you'll enjoy every last minute of it.
Jeffrey Sisk is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1952, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.