Avetts serve up tasty leftovers on 'Magpie'
‘Magpie and the Dandelion'
The Avett Brothers (American)
I've spent the better part of a decade singing the praises of North Carolina folk/rock outfit the Avett Brothers to anyone who'll listen. Their 2007 masterpiece “Emotionalism” remains in constant rotation on my iPod, and the Avetts served up my favorite records of 2009 (“I and Love and You”) and 2012 (“The Carpenter”). So imagine my delight when it was revealed that the band wrote and recorded another album's worth of songs during “The Carpenter” sessions with super-producer Rick Rubin. “Magpie and the Dandelion” is another fantastic effort, though maybe a half-step behind the three records that preceded it, and should please the band's ever-growing fan base.
The 11-track release finds the Brothers mining familiar musical turf, which is just fine by me. Siblings/songwriters/multi-instrumentalists Scott and Seth Avett harmonize and trade vocals, while pal Bob Crawford holds down the fort on bass. “Open Ended Life” gets “Magpie” off to a winning start, and the Avett Brothers score with “Morning Song,” “Another Is Waiting,” “Bring Your Love to Me,” “Skin and Bones” and “The Clearness Is Gone.” A band that sets the bar impossibly high each and every time out, the Avetts have done it again.
Jeffrey Sisk is an editor for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-664-9161 ext. 1952, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.