Survivor debuts with Ma
BOSTON — A 90-year-old Holocaust survivor made his orchestral debut with renowned cellist Yo-Yo Ma on Tuesday to benefit a foundation that seeks to preserve the work of artists and musicians killed by the Nazis.
Ma and George Horner, a retired doctor who lives near Philadelphia, embraced in a small room in Boston's Symphony Hall before rehearsal.
Ma thanked Horner for helping the Terezin Music Foundation, named for the town of Terezin, site of an unusual Jewish ghetto in German-occupied Czechoslovakia. Amid death and hard labor, Nazi soldiers let prisoners stage performances.
The pair performed music composed 70 years ago when Horner was incarcerated.
“It's an extraordinary link to the past,” said organizer Mark Ludwig, who leads the foundation.
Horner played piano and accordion in the Terezin cabarets, including tunes written by fellow inmate Karel Svenk. Horner played two of Svenk's works solo — a march and a lullaby — and teamed with Ma for a third piece called “How Come the Black Man Sits in the Back of the Bus?”
Svenk did not survive. But his musical legacy has, in part because of a chance meeting of Ludwig, a scholar of Terezin composers, and Horner, who never forgot the songs of captivity.
Ma said before the performance that he hoped it will inspire people.
“I grew up with the words, ‘never again,'” said Ma, who was born 10 years after the end of World War II.
“To me, George Horner is a huge hero and is a huge inspiration,” Ma said. “He is a witness to a window, and to a slice of history, that we never want to see again.”
Horner served time in Terezin, Auschwitz and Buchenwald. His parents and sister died in the camps.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.