Share This Page

Ex-Pittsburgher eliminated from 'The Voice'

| Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2013, 9:45 a.m.
Trae Patton/NBC
Coach Adam Levine says goodbye to contestant James Wolpert on the Dec. 10, 2013 episode of NBC's 'The Voice.'

Former Pittsburgher James Wolpert's time on NBC's “The Voice” has ended.

The former Carnegie Mellon University student and Shadyside Apple store employee was eliminated on Tuesday's live show.

Wolpert, who sang U2's “With or Without You” on Monday, had been saved by instant Twitter voting last week, which this season has generally lead to elimination the next week.

After being eliminated, the Lancaster native told Zap2it.com that he doesn't see this as a setback.

“I just can't wait to continue creating music,” said Wolpert, who recently moved to Los Angeles to pursue his career. “I really want to put the emphasis on creating music. I want to cut a record. I want to start going on tour. I want to do musician things and start making this my life. I want to learn — there's so much I have to learn about what it takes to be a recording artist, about what it takes to go on tour. I want to take this time and be a sponge and start meeting people and start — just start. This is all an awesome beginning. I can't wait to see where it goes.”

Three contestants remain on “The Voice” — Tessanne Chin, Jacquie Lee and Will Champlin. They'll face off in the finals at 8 p.m. Dec. 16 with the results at 9 p.m. Dec. 17.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.