ShareThis Page

Oakmont Elks Players promise a challenging 'who-dun-it'

| Wednesday, Oct. 18, 2017, 9:00 p.m.
Murder in the Court 1
Judge Jil O’Teen (Dennis Kanouff), Archie Hoochie, the intended victim (Frank Vollero); Chatta Hoochie, the accused (Darla Vollero).
Submitted
Murder in the Court 1 Judge Jil O’Teen (Dennis Kanouff), Archie Hoochie, the intended victim (Frank Vollero); Chatta Hoochie, the accused (Darla Vollero).

Upper Burrell playwright Marilyn McNally's imagination is on the loose again.

Audiences are about to take a roller coaster ride of slapstick humor as the Elks Players' stage her latest spoof, “‘Murder in the Court,” at their lodge in Oakmont.

The dinner theater murder mystery Oct. 27-28 again benefits Elks charities. It's their ninth production since 2015, all penned and directed by McNally.

Have any of them been a drama or a serious play?

“That won't ever happen,” McNally says. “I write the comedy for the laughter it brings. I always watch the audience to see them laugh because that is so important to me.

“I never thought I had any ability at this, but once I got started, I thought I was pretty funny and when people concurred that kept me going.”

She loves the writing “because my imagination gets free reign,” she says. “I know every character personally and that makes it easier to match one of the actors to it.”

She has a blast in creating intriguing character names, plays on words that get the point across. Exhibit “A” in this show is Sue DeBastards (portrayed by Jan Schlegel of Plum), lawyer for Chatta Hoochey (Darla Vollero of Penn Hills), a woman on trial for the attempted murder of her husband Archie.

The productions are quite satisfying for her and the cast. McNally also has a part as Mary Jane Reefer.

“Our cast is almost always the same and they love doing this. We laugh our way through rehearsals,” she says. “We're all members of the Elks. Since the BPOE was originally started by a group of actors called ‘The Jolly Corks,' we like to think we're keeping their tradition somewhat alive.”

A loyal audience attends the shows.

“Our plays are for adult audiences, with a good sense of humor,” says Schlegel. “The audience will have a good time. Who doesn't like to watch people making fools of themselves just to make people laugh?”

It's an opportunity for the cast to move out of its comfort zone, says Vollero, “and let people see us act silly.”

Debbie Kennelly of Oakmont sees this year's offering as “a little different from our usual presentation,” but is giving no secrets away. She plays Ruby Tungwagger, the neighbor of the plaintiff and defendant.

“She is very nosy and loves nothing better than hearing and relating juicy gossip,” Kennelly says.

“Murder in the Court” is “zany, like the others that our writer and director, Marilyn McNally has written,” says Dennis Kanouff of Plum. He appreciates that her scripts give the actors freedom to be creative.

He plays a woman, the honorable Judge Jil O'Teen, a Judge Judy wannabe. “I've always admired Judge Judy's straight forwardness, I get to tell it like it is,” Kanouff says.

He offers this guarantee: “All will have a good time. Some will actually be pulled into action as a character in the play. Others will be pulled unknowingly into becoming involved on the sidelines.”

He is aware that with mysteries, “people like to figure things out just to prove, ‘I told you so!' or ‘I knew it all along.' ”

That won't be the case, with this show, he promises. “They won't figure this one out,” he says.

Rex Rutkoski is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.