West Mifflin student takes top prize at August Wilson monologue contest
The fifth annual Pittsburgh August Wilson Monologue competition winners are Thembisile Gxuluwe, first place; Tamiya Martin, second; and Shamari Nevels, third.
Photo by Dino DiStefano
Thembisile Gxuluwe took first place in the fifth annual Pittsburgh August Wilson Monologue Competition. Gxuluwe, a student at West Mifflin High School, portrayed Tanya in a monologue from Wilson's “King Hedley II.”
Tamiya Martin, from Pittsburgh Creative and Performing Arts School, performed a different monologue from “King Hedley II” and took second place. Shamari Nevels, who lives in Highland Park and is home-schooled, won third place with Caesar Wilkes' monologue from “Gem of the Ocean.”
As first-place winner, Gxuluwe received a $500 cash prize and a $10,000 scholarship from Point Park University. Martin won $250 and a $7,000 Point Park University scholarship, and Nevels won $100 and a $5,000 Point Park University scholarship.
Twenty-five students participated in the local competition, sponsored by the Bill Nunn Outreach Project founded by actor Bill Nunn. It is part of a national August Wilson Monologue Competition that was created to connect students to the playwright's 10-play Century Cycle and to encourage schools to incorporate the plays into the high-school curriculum.
All three winners of the Pittsburgh contest will travel to New York City to participate in the national competition May 5 and 6 at the August Wilson Theater on Broadway.
Alice T. Carter is the theater critic for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.