The Pittsburgh CAPA production and performers of “In the Heights” received a dozen nominations for the 2013 Gene Kelly Awards.
Keystone Oaks' “The Drowsy Chaperone” and Quaker Valley's “Anything Goes” were each nominated in eight categories.
In all, 22 of the 27 high-school productions will be eligible to win in one or more categories when winners are announced May 25 at the Benedum Center, Downtown.
Over the past three months, a panel of 32 performing-arts educators, arts administrators, entertainment professionals and performers attended performances at 29 Allegheny County high schools. That panel of judges then met May 3 to review highlights from the shows and participate in discussions.
Nominations and awards for best scenic design, costume design, lighting design and production are evaluated in three budget divisions, with Budget Level I as the lowest. Nominations and awards in the nine remaining categories are considered without respect to budget levels.
The nominees for best actor and best actress will be competing for the opportunity to represent Pittsburgh Civic Light Opera's Gene Kelly Awards in the fifth-annual National High School Musical Theater Awards in New York City on Monday, July 1. For more information on the National High School Musical Theater Awards, visit www.nhsmta.com.
In addition to the more than 20 Kelly Awards presented at the event, several cash and university scholarships will be awarded.
The 23rd Annual Gene Kelly Awards show will begin at 7:30 p.m. May 25 at the Benedum Center. Tickets will be priced at $35; $20 for students, when they go on sale May 15.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our
Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent
via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.