ShareThis Page

Review: CLO presents 'Phantom' that's lighter, quicker than Webber's

| Sunday, June 23, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Matt Polk
Ron Bohmer as The Phantom and Erin Mackey as Christine in 'Kopit & Yeston's Phantom' presented by Pittsburgh CLO.
Matt Polk
Ron Bohmer as The Phantom and Erin Mackey as Christine in 'Kopit & Yeston's Phantom' presented by Pittsburgh CLO.
Matt Polk
Donna Lynne Champlin as Carlotta in 'Kopit and Yeston's Phantom' presented by Pittsburgh CLO.

“Kopit & Yeston's Phantom” seems to be forever doomed to be known as “the other Phantom.”

Back in the 1980s, playwright Arthur Kopit and composer and lyricist Maury Yeston were working on their musical adaptation of Gaston Leroux's novel when Andrew Lloyd Webber's spectacle-filled musical opened in London and dropped its chandelier on their plans.

Kopit & Yeston's musical has had 1,000 independent productions since then, while Webber's became the longest-running show in Broadway history.

Maybe what the Kopit/Yeston version needs is re-branding.

If the Pittsburgh Civic Light Opera production that opened June 21 is any guide, the show should more accurately be termed “the lighter, faster and funnier ‘Phantom.' ”

In place of Webber's extravagant rock-opera score with its dramatically punctuated chords, Yeston's music follows a more traditional musical theater format that begins with a waltzy, upbeat “Melodie de Paris.”

That sets the pace for the evening, even in darker moments when the Phantom gives us his counter-perspective in “Paris Is a Tomb” or when Donna Lynne Champlin's Carlotta voices her diva agenda in the comedic “This Place Is Mine.”

Kopit's script concentrates more on character than Gothic thrills.

The playwright gives the Phantom a name — Erik — and a back story that explains his past and how he came to live in the dark, dank, watery confines below the Paris Opera House. He and actor Ron Bohmer give us a dark and unhappy Erik who also has a wry sense of humor. He's far more sympathetic and less of a creepy stalker than Webber's Phantom.

That makes it easier to see why Christine is drawn to her unseen, mysterious mentor who brings out the best in her voice.

Not that that would be a heavy task. From the opening number, Erin Mackey displays a lovely, lilting voice both in her duets with Erik — “You Are Music” — and with her aristocratic suitor Philippe — “Who Could Have Dreamed You Up” — and in her solo “My True Love.”

Jamie Ross turns in a nuanced and touching performance as Erik's protector, Gerard Carriere.

The musical begins by introducing the many characters and storylines and setting the evening's pace with short scenes that move swiftly through an impressive number of locations.

Director and choreographer Barry Ivan keeps that pace throughout as Paris Opera company members scheme, threaten or are threatened, fall in love and pursue their separate but intertwined agendas.

Drops, wings and borders fly in and out, and set pieces appear and disappear swiftly and seamlessly thanks to scenery provided by Theatre Under the Stars and an efficient crew of technicians.

The show retains the period feel of the Paris of Leroux's 1910 novel as well as the ambiance of an old-fashioned operetta romance. That impression is enhanced by a large ensemble that dances, sings and fills in the background in the cafe, the streets of Paris and the Opera House performances.

In scenes set onstage and backstage at the Paris Opera, the chandelier that became Webber's signature piece remains in the background, allowing characters and story to be the center of attention.

While “Kopit & Yeston's Phantom” will never surpass the emotional and visual impact and excesses of Webber's, it is a thoroughly pleasant night at the Opera.

Alice T. Carter is the theater critic for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7808 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.