Westinghouse's incoming CEO resigns
By Kim Leonard
Published: Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Jim Ferland turned in his resignation to Westinghouse Electric Co.'s board of directors on the same weekend that he was supposed to become the nuclear energy company's new chief executive.
Cranberry-based Westinghouse announced Ferland's departure on Tuesday, but officially gave no reason for it.
Ferland's resignation comes as a surprise.
"It was a personal decision," Westinghouse spokesman Scott Shaw said, and it had nothing to do with two German utilities' cancellations last week of plans for nuclear power plants in the United Kingdom.
Board Chairman Shigenori Shiga will be interim CEO, with Chief Operating Officer Ricardo Perez keeping his present duties while helping Shiga during the search for a new president and CEO.
Shaw said Perez is a candidate to become CEO. Perez was unavailable for comment.
Westinghouse and affiliates could have made up to $6 billion from the deal in the United Kingdom. Shaw said Ferland didn't leave the company over growing apprehension surrounding the nuclear industry since an earthquake rocked the Fukushima Daiichi complex in northern Japan in March 2011.
Reactors damaged at the Japanese site weren't Westinghouse designs.They were supplied by General Electric Co., Hitachi and Toshiba Corp., which became Westinghouse's majority owner in 2006.
Shiga became board chairman in 2010 and previously was Toshiba's chief coordination officer since the Westinghouse acquisition. Ferland and Shiga couldn't be reached for comment.
One industry expert who declined to be named said Westinghouse's vision of itself as a technology leader that licenses nuclear designs worldwide, while working to develop better ones, might have moved out of sync lately with Toshiba's vision.
The Japanese company reportedly hasn't met Westinghouse's expectations for investments in research and development, the expert said. Toshiba now might view Westinghouse as just one part of its nuclear division, which is relatively small, and believe it may have overpaid for its $5.4 billion stake in the company, the expert said.
A Toshiba spokesman could not be reached for comment.
In January, Westinghouse announced that Ferland and Perez would succeed Aris Candris as of April 1. Candris was with the company for 37 years and was CEO for more than three years.
Ferland previously was president of Westinghouse's Americas region, and Perez was operations president. The two were to make up a newly formed executive office for Westinghouse.
Shaw didn't know whether Ferland submitted his resignation on Saturday or Sunday but said the board accepted it. Shaw said he has no information about a severance package for Ferland.
Ferland began his second stint at Westinghouse in August 2010. He worked for the company for six years, becoming vice president of field services. He then spent three years as senior vice president of utility operations for electric utility PNM Resources in Albuquerque, N.M.
Westinghouse said it supplies products and technologies to about 60 percent of the U.S. nuclear fleet.
Its "advanced passive" AP1000 reactor is being built in China, where the company won a $5.3 billion contract in 2007. The first two of the four reactors there are expected to come online next year.
Utilities in the United States also have chosen the AP1000 design for four reactors that they want to build at power plants in Georgia and South Carolina.
Westinghouse employs 5,100 people in Western Pennsylvania, mostly at its headquarters campus in Cranberry.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.