Cargill, Tyson don't plan plant closures due to 'pink slime'
Cargill Inc. and Tyson Foods Inc., the two largest beef processors, said they don't plan to close plants because of lower demand for finely textured beef, called "pink slime" by critics.
Cargill doesn't plan closures or job cuts as it scales back output of finely textured beef at two plants in Texas, one in Nebraska and one in Kansas, said Mike Martin, a spokesman for the Minneapolis-based company. Some retailers stopped using the product in ground beef they sell, the company said.
Celebrity chef Jamie Oliver is among food activists who have criticized the use of what they dubbed "pink slime," a filler produced by treating finely ground beef scraps with ammonia hydroxide to kill pathogens. The drop in demand led AFA Foods, a ground-beef processor owned by Yucaipa Cos., to seek bankruptcy court protection. Beef Products Inc. last week temporarily suspended production at three plants.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.