Packard 1st car to have cool air
Hot enough for you• Not as toasty as your car or truck sitting in the summer sun.
According to AAA, your vehicle's interior reaches between 131 and 172 degrees when parked in the sun and the temperature is in the low to mid-90s. That's hot enough to roast a hot dog on the front seat.
This wasn't always an issue for one simple reason: We used to sweat a lot more in the summer.
The earliest automobiles were open to the elements; catching a breeze was easy. Once the closed car was introduced, keeping cool on a hot day became more of a challenge. Manufacturers equipped closed cars with roll-down windows or windshields that tilted open slightly. By the 1930s, many vehicles also had pop-up vents ahead of the windshield to funnel air to the cabin.
Of course, it wasn't as if you would suddenly become cooler; the air was still hot. And it was filled with dirt, pollen and bugs. Coupled with the engine heat older cars gave off, and their metal and leather interiors, these vehicles could be hot enough to melt your enthusiasm.
This contrasts to office buildings, stores and movie theaters -- which were increasingly being equipped with air conditioning. But reducing their size so that could work on an automobile was another matter.
General Motors, with help from its Frigidaire division, started working on the problem in 1933. Initially, engineers proposed cooling a car's interior by a mere 10 degrees, as it was feared that any greater cooling would lead passengers to experiencing thermal shock while stepping into the hot sun from a cool car.
Six years later, GM had a prototype system ready, fitted in the trunk of a Cadillac. But it wasn't GM that got to market first. Instead, that honor went to Cadillac's rival, Packard, which offered the "Weather Conditioner" as a $274 option.
According to Mohinder Bhatti of the American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Packard sold 1,500 cars with air conditioning between 1940 and 1942. Cadillac's system was offered for 1941 models; some 300 were sold. A year later, Chrysler offered its AirTemp system, although few, if any, cars were sold with it.
As with any new technology, these systems suffered from several problems:
-- There were no controls on the instrument panel; the system ran constantly. Turning it off meant lifting the hood and removing a belt.
-- The units were mounted in the trunk, reducing trunk space.
-- Because the A/C units were rear-mounted, it wasn't unusual for condensation to collect above rear seat passengers. It would then drip down, staining clothes. Meanwhile, little air reached the front seat.
-- Unlike later systems, these early units didn't pull in any outside air, a problem in an era when many people were smokers.
Given the problems of the system and its expense, it's a wonder any were ordered. Instead, many drivers used swamp coolers, a window-mounted metal tube that would be filled with ice. As air blew over the ice, it was cooled. The chilled air was funneled inside.
Air conditioning would not become a big player in automobiles until 1953, when GM, Chrysler and Packard introduced new air-conditioning systems. Others soon followed, and by 1956, all major American car companies offered air conditioning as an option.
The following year, Cadillac offered A/C as standard equipment on the Cadillac Eldorado Brougham, an industry first.
Even so, it was rare to find a car back then with factory air. With an average price of $435, just 3.7 percent of cars had it, but that would grow significantly over the next decade as the price dropped. By 1969, more than half of all new cars came with air conditioning.
For those who couldn't afford factory-installed air-conditioning units, aftermarket units installed under the dashboard were common.
Two years later, The New York Times, in a front-page story, blamed air conditioning for the dwindling popularity of convertibles. They were correct. By 1977, not one American auto manufacturer made one, a victim of falling demand and proposed government rollover regulations that never materialized.
It was during this time, the 1970s, that scientists found that chlorofluorocarbons, or CFCs, were depleting the earth's ozone layer. Since most auto air-conditioning units used a CFC-based refrigerant named R-12, it fell to automakers to come up with a solution.
It was no small matter.
In 1980, 72 percent of all new cars had A/C. By 1990, 94 percent of cars had it. And all of these systems used R-12.
Preliminary tests on a suitable replacement, R-134a, began in 1978. Once it proved satisfactory a decade later, car manufacturers were required by the U.S. government to switch over to R-134a by 1996. It is still in use.
Today, almost every car and truck comes with air conditioning, although there are exceptions. They include base models of the Chevrolet Aveo; Honda Civic; Hyundai Accent and Elantra; Jeep Wrangler; Kia Forte and Rio; Mazda 3; Mitsubishi Lancer; Nissan Versa; and Smart ForTwo.
So while finding a car with standard air conditioning is no sweat, a lot of it was shed to keep you cool in the summer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Apple Hill Playhouse takes on an updated ‘Snow White’
- Alvarez homer triggers winning outburst for Pirates
- High tax could scuttle online gaming in Pa., CEO says
- Gameday: Pirates vs. Padres, July 6, 2015
- McCutchen, Pirates hitters increasingly in crosshairs
- Pirates get journeyman Ishikawa off waivers; outfielder Marte injured
- Geibel Catholic acting, music camp enters 4th year
- Alamo named as World Heritage site by United Nations
- The Export-Import Bank: Do not resuscitate
- Starting 9: Pirates missing out on young bat
- Pirates minor league report: Ramirez more mindful while at plate