PNC reaches $168M million settlement in National City lawsuit
PNC Financial Services Group Inc. said it reached an agreement to pay $168 million to settle a securities fraud lawsuit brought by investors of National City Corp., which the company acquired in 2008.
Investors, led by the New York State Common Retirement Fund, sued National City in 2008, claiming the bank misrepresented the extent of losses from mortgages and home equity loans, artificially inflating share value.
The lawsuit claimed that National City shares dropped from $37 in April 2007 to less than $10 a year later.
Pittsburgh-based PNC, the sixth largest U.S. bank, said in a securities filing that the effect of the settlement on PNC's future results was expected to be immaterial.
A PNC spokesman couldn't be reached for comment. Separately, PNC said it was subpoenaed by federal prosecutors investigating lending practices at National City.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- 10 of Jon Stewart’s highlights from ‘The Daily Show’
- U.S. asks Supreme Court to reinstate convictions of portfolio managers who won on appeal
- Warrant issued for man accused of killing Brookline woman
- Police: Escaped Armstrong County inmate armed, dangerous homicide suspect
- Man wounded in Marshall-Shadeland shooting
- Pirates’ Burnett endures another poor start in blowout loss to Reds
- Cost-cutting at Kraft Heinz extends to refrigerator
- Roundup: Shell to cut jobs to cope with prolonged period of cheap oil; U.S. Corrugated building $43.5M plant in California; more
- Pirates bolster bullpen by trading for former closer Soria
- Campy’s nabs final playoff spot
- Mon Valley school districts wait out budget impasse