Squirrel Hill development dropped
A plan for a $50 million development at a key Squirrel Hill intersection apparently has been dropped.
Development firm Cambridge Venture Partners planned to build a hotel, restaurant, stores and 20 condominiums at Forward and Murray avenues. The former Poli's restaurant and Squirrel Hill Theater buildings would have been demolished.
But now Equity Real Estate of Squirrel Hill is marketing most of the land. Cambridge "told us they were unable to secure financing for the condominium portion of a building, and that forced them to drop the project," David G. Tkacik of Equity said.
Attempts to reach principals at Cambridge and at the Downtown-based R.E. Crawford Construction firm, which was part of the partnership, were unsuccessful.
The condos were to be on the top level of a nine-story building, with the hotel in the center and retail space on the lower levels.
Bill Matthews of Howard Hanna Commercial Real Estate Services has listed the Poli's building for sale at $895,000. Packaged with an adjacent 17-space parking lot, the price is $1.395 million.
Equity is trying to sell the closed theater and other parts of the property running from 5800 to 5826 Forward Ave. The owner is Alderson-Forward Properties LLC, an investment group made up of former Pittsburgh residents.
Steve Hawkins, who was chairman of the Squirrel Hill Urban Coalition when the plan was announced in 2008, still would like to see that corner redeveloped.
"A hotel would be nice since it is close to the Parkway East and in walking distance of the existing retail area," he said.
The project would have closed Tango Gelato and Cafe, which serves Argentinian coffee and foods. Patrons formed Friends of the Tango Cafe to try to preserve the restaurant, but the campaign ended when the developer didn't move forward. The cafe and Pizza Amier are the only tenants still open.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.