Sale of mansion on hold in LeNature's case
By Richard Gazarik and Kim Leonard ,
Published: Friday, Oct. 3, 2008
An $8 million mansion built by former LeNature's Inc. CEO Gregory Podlucky is for sale.
Then again, maybe not.
U.S. District Chief Bankruptcy Judge M. Bruce McCullough on Thursday delayed a decision until Oct. 31 whether to issue a permanent injunction to prevent Podlucky and his wife, Karla, from selling the luxurious structure off Route 711 in Ligonier.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Thomas P. Agresti last week issued a temporary injunction against the Podluckys.
Confusion surrounds the proposed deal.
Several weeks ago, Ligonier Township officials received a request from Joseph Nocito of Sewickley in Allegheny County asking if there were any municipal liens against the property because a sale was pending. Ligonier officials were told the closing was set for Sept. 24.
Nocito told the Tribune-Review he didn't know anything about the deal.
In seeking a delay, attorney James Joseph, said "that would give us time to figure out the nature of the transaction, if there is a transaction, on the property and to determine the value." Joseph represents Marc Kirschner, the liquidating trustee in the LeNature's bankruptcy.
Joseph said there is information that an entity other than Nocito is involved, although the proposed buyer has spoken to Nocito. Still, Nocito has been dropped as a party from the case.
Joseph would not comment on the hearing.
Attorney Robert O. Lampl, representing the Podluckys, said he is not sure there is a prospective buyer. He said "rumors" were the reason Nocito's name surfaced in connection with the property.
"People have been interested for a couple of years, but no one has stepped up," Lampl said.
The mansion, which Podlucky claims was to be a training center for LeNature's employees, is a 25,000-square-foot building that contains seven fireplaces, custom woodwork, an auditorium, a guest house and a five-car garage. About $8 million was spent on the mansion, which would have been worth $15 million if it had been completed, court records say.
The training center was another leftover from the massive fraud that pushed LeNature's into bankruptcy in November 2006, costing creditors more than $820 million and about 240 employees their jobs.
The building is in the Podluckys' name and was not part of the bankruptcy of the defunct Latrobe beverage company.
Kirschner likely would sue the Podluckys to obtain ownership of the land so he could sell it and provide creditors with the proceeds. He maintains in court documents that Podlucky used company funds to building the house.
Attorney Tom Ceraso, who represents Podlucky in a pending federal criminal probe into money laundering, bank, wire and mail fraud, said the sale was an effort by his client to pay off $1.2 million in liens filed by companies who worked on the project.
"Greg wasn't going to get 10 cents out of the deal," Ceraso said. "This deal is just to satisfy the liens outside the bankruptcy."
Podlucky has been accused in court records in Westmoreland County of fraudulently listing his three sons as holders of a $56.7 million mortgage they gave him for the property.
A lawsuit filed in Westmoreland County alleges the deal was a ruse to allow Podlucky to maintain ownership. It claims the loan was a fraudulent transfer because no money changed hands in the transaction.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.