Rosebud Mining sued over warnings
By Brian Bowling
Published: Friday, Dec. 31, 2010
The Labor Department filed a federal lawsuit Thursday to stop Rosebud Mining Co. officials from warning workers when federal mine inspectors enter one of the Kittanning company's 18 underground mines.
In affidavits filed with the lawsuit, Mine Safety and Health Administration inspectors describe how surface personnel at Rosebud's Mine 78 in Somerset County and Tracy Lynne mine in Armstrong County ignored orders not to signal underground workers about the inspectors' arrival, then laughed when they were caught.
The two mines were among 111 "troubling" mines that MSHA selected nationwide for extra inspections after the April 5 explosion that killed 29 miners in the Upper Big Branch mine in Montcoal, W.Va. The mines were picked based on their track record of mine safety violations and several other factors, including high accident and injury rates.
Giving advance notice of a mine inspection is illegal and carries a penalty of up to $1,000 in fines and six months in prison.
Leni Fortson, a Labor Department spokesman, said MSHA wants the court to issue a preliminary injunction telling Rosebud Mining to stop breaking the law.
"We want to stop it from happening again," she said.
If a federal judge issues the injunction and company personnel violate it, the agency can ask the judge to hold the company in contempt of court, Fortson said. The agency obtained a federal preliminary injunction in May against two Kentucky mines for similar violations.
Jim Baker, vice president of Rosebud Mining, said he hadn't heard of the lawsuit and had no response to its allegations.
"We'll have to check on it and see what's going on," he said.
In the past few months, MSHA has changed how it conducts inspections, he added.
MSHA stepped up efforts to hold surprise inspections in coal mines after the Upper Big Branch disaster. Miners said officials with the Massey Energy Co. subsidiary that operated the mine would signal workers before inspectors entered the mine so that the workers could cover up health and safety violations that could have led to the mine's being temporarily shut down.
The agency issued a bulletin in August warning coal operators that it would bring enforcement actions against companies that continued to warn workers that inspectors were entering a mine.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.