Allegheny Energy's $1.2 billion energy project shapes up
By Rick Stouffer
Published: Saturday, Aug. 16, 2008
Allegheny Energy Inc. said Friday it secured most of the funding for its proposed $1.2 billion high-voltage transmission line, and has selected Fairmont, W.Va., for its new transmission operations headquarters.
Funding totaling $550 million was secured by Allegheny Energy's Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Co. subsidiary, which will own and operate the power line, pending regulatory approvals.
The Trans-Allegheny line includes a 500,000-volt line that begins in Washington County and runs south into West Virginia, then east, before ending in Loudoun County, Va., a total of 240 miles. Three, 15-mile 138,000-volt lines are also part of the Pennsylvania portion of the project.
Allegheny Energy's share of the total $1.2 billion project cost is about $850 million, with Dominion Virginia Power paying for the Virginia portion of the project.
Yesterday, Allegheny Energy also said it selected a 9-acre parcel in the Interstate 70 High Technology Park outside Fairmont, W.Va., as the location for its $50 million transmission line operations headquarters.
The facility will house an operations center and will serve as home to Allegheny Energy's transmission planning, engineering, maintenance and construction functions.
"With two major expansion projects under way, we need a new center to meet the complex requirements of our transmission system, and North Central West Virginia is an ideal location," said Allegheny Energy Chairman and CEO Paul J. Evanson, in a statement.
Evanson was referring to the Trans-Allegheny power line and to PATH, the Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline, a $1.8 billion joint venture between Allegheny Energy and American Electric Power of Columbus, Ohio.
PATH will span about 290 miles beginning at American Electric's John Amos coal-fired power plant near St. Albans, W. Va., and run northeast through West Virginia carrying 765,000 volts, the highest-voltage power line in use, before changing to twin 500,000-volt lines for the path through rural central Maryland to a substation to be built near Frederick, Md.
Greensburg-based Allegheny Energy had announced in April it would build a new transmission center near Morgantown and staff it with up to 150 personnel. Fairmont is about 14 miles south of Morgantown.
Agreeing to build the center was a major piece of a settlement pact between Allegheny Energy, the Consumer Advocate Division of the West Virginia Public Service Commission and a group of large West Virginia electricity users known as the West Virginia Energy Users Group.
The pact was needed for the energy company to win approval with conditions earlier this month for the West Virginia portion of the Trans-Allegheny line from the West Virginia Public Service Commission.
The Trans-Allegheny line still must be approved by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission and the Virginia State Corporation Commission.
Allegheny Energy expects to begin construction on the Fairmont facility in 2009, with completion slated for mid-2011.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Analysis: Kesler remains on Penguins’ radar as Shero looks bring back ‘Big 3’ formula
- Starkey: Steelers know when to say goodbye
- Pirates’ big risk with pitch-heavy draft focus might soon pay off
- Ex-Colts executive Polian: Approach free agency with caution
- With so many needs, Steelers can ill afford to miss in draft
- Penguins GM Shero’s deadline deals: Addition by subtraction
- Markleysburg man killed in Fayette County crash
- IUP students have raucous early St. Patrick’s Day celebration
- SUV flips onto its side on Parkway East
- Pitt rallies in final seconds of regulation en route to OT win at Clemson
- Steelers defense doesn’t make the grade in 2013 review