Bad vibe? Refuse job offer
Jenny learned the hard way whom to work for — or not.
She had an interview with a newly hatched startup that acted like a clumsy and disorganized mess. First, they flew her across country to meet but decided not to hire her because of something she said that had been misconstrued.
When she explained that wasn't at all what she said, they flew her back for a second interview, where she discovered she was scheduled to meet the same person.
“Somehow they didn't know he'd interviewed me already,” she said. “I should have taken it as a sign that they weren't the most efficient administrators.”
But she got the offer and packed up and moved herself and her family. The company went out of business within 18 months.
About 20 some years later, another opportunity has come knocking. This time, she's paying closer attention.
A few weeks after filing her application, she met with senior executives. Weeks later, someone called asking about salary expectations, and she responded. This is where it gets good.
Next thing she knows she gets an email saying, “Here are the forms we'd like you to bring to work on your first day.”
“Are you offering me the job?” she wrote back. Response: “No, we got ahead of ourselves. There will be an offer.”
But none came.
A second email asking about salary came, and she reminded them she'd already sent it. They wrote: “We'll get back to you.” She was offered the job. When she asked to speak with someone to learn more about the job and her potential boss, she was told that was not possible. And that if she didn't accept right then and there, the offer was off the table. She turned it down.
It goes without saying that before you make a move, you evaluate the obvious: What's the job exactly? What are the duties and expectations? Who's your boss? What's the culture, financial health and reputation of the firm?
But just as important and a notion many people dismiss is how they treat you. And as a result, how do you feel about them?
Companies are looking at this when it comes to you. They're noticing how you treat them and how that strikes them. They're also concluding: If you act like this now, you'll act like this on the job.
So if you're careless with correspondence and follow-up, they're likely thinking you'll be careless on the job. Act immature and unprofessional, they'll probably conclude you'll act that way at work. Can't show up on time or follow up? You won't be reliable on the job either.
If you get annoyed when they ask questions, they'll figure you'll be difficult to deal with at work. If you threaten or demand, they'll conclude you'll treat them and their clients or customers the same way. Come to interviews full of excuses about why something happened at past jobs and they'll likely decide you'll be full of excuses about why your work isn't done.
So turn the tables. If they're callous and careless with you in the interview process, odds are good they'll treat you that way on the job.
If their procedures are disorganized and clunky, and they aren't reliable about following up, it's likely that's how they conduct business.
If they get annoyed with your questions about the job, they'll probably be difficult to deal with on the job, too.
Email Andrew Kay at email@example.com. Twitter: @AndreaKayCareer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Wainwright, Cardinals rough up Locke in 6-4 victory over Pirates
- Lambo no longer in limbo with Pirates
- Four issues that the Steelers need to take care of in September
- Pair share love of dance with youths in Fayette, Westmoreland
- Pittsburgh Mayor Peduto says new police chief’s skills fit the job well
- Google’s corporate products division changes name
- Slovenian Club in Claridge is marking 100th anniversary
- Steelers notebook: Tomlin won’t discuss discipline for Bell, Blount
- Penn State football team’s future won’t include ‘Distraction’ trips
- Fittingly, a party ushers out Revel
- Alle-Kiski Valley high school roundup: No. 2 Riverview wins in opener