ShareThis Page

It should be service, not evasion

Andrea Kay
| Wednesday, Oct. 30, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

In the past 30 days, I canceled service with three companies I used for years.

Customer service was the reason. It was that bad.

But I kept my business with another company even though its actual service keeps messing up. That business' customer service is that good.

Customer-service representatives are everywhere. Anyone with a phone, TV, computer, coffee maker, credit card or insurance; or who buys subscription services or makeup from companies advertising on TV has dealt with them. Let's not forget about business-to-business customer-service reps.

Their numbers are growing. The Bureau of Labor Statistics predicts the profession will expand 15.5 percent through 2020.

Call centers alone had almost 23,000 vacant jobs, more than a third listed in the past week, according to CallCenterCrossing, which calls itself the largest collection of call-center jobs. The company cites the health care law, holiday season and general economic expansion as the chief reasons.

As long as companies offer things to buy and services to use, folks will need help.

Companies claim to know how important these front-line jobs are. So why don't more customer-service reps deliver? Is it the company or the employees?

Likely both.

Workers tell me they want these jobs because they like people. Too many companies do everything they can to not let their people talk to us.

Some refuse to talk to you. Take Twitter: My account has had a problem for four months. I've followed Twitter's directions and sent in a dozen requests for help.

I'm still waiting for an answer.

On the other hand, companies such as crowdSPRING help businesses and creative talent find each other and make it easy for customers to communicate with them.

This company posts its phone number on every page of its site. Co-founder Mike Samson tells his reps that the spoken word is better than the written word, to say “please” and “thank you” and always end with “much obliged.”

People who get into customer service tell me they love to solve problems. Yet “I can't help you with that” are the last words that a lot of people hear from a customer-service rep. Those workers either don't know how to think like a problem solver or don't think they have the authority to help.

Some customer-service reps are mean. The other day I asked one if she might speak a little louder. She snapped, “No, I can't scream.”

When you keep getting bad customer service, you wonder why companies keep sending surveys asking how your customer-service experience went.

I often wonder why companies insist that customer-service reps speak canned faux caring phrases after they've been mean and obstructive.

Chief Operating Officer Zach Cusimano of Bizness Apps, which makes mobile apps for companies, says his business doesn't coach reps to use particular phrases. Company officials encourage them to “throw in some love” and foster more interactions by saying, “I'm happy to help,” or “Please let me know if you have any other questions.”

If you want a satisfying career helping solve problems for people who are frustrated, confused and sometimes angry, care for them no matter what.

Find a great company that values them and you.

Career consultant Andrea Kay writes for Gannett News Service. Reach her at Twitter: @AndreaKayCareer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.