Rates likely to dip, soar
By John Browne
Published: Saturday, Aug. 3, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Many economic observers see signs of recovery in the U.S. economy and even of stabilization in Europe. They are forecasting a continued rise in interest rates.
If these observers prove correct, homebuyers face higher mortgage rates and investors can expect further losses in their “safe” bond portfolios. If these sanguine economic forecasts are wrong and recession rather than demand-led inflation threatens, homebuyers and bondholders may heave a sigh of relief.
The Commerce Department reports new home sales climbing and their value rising 12 percent over a year ago. The Labor Department showed jobless claims fell 19,000 to 326,000 last week. Annalisa Piazza, a fixed income analyst at Newedge Group of London, maintains that “there's been a signal that the global business cycle may have reached the bottom and the economy is recovering.”
Many economists agree with this forecast, and politicians seize gleefully on such opinion. Doubtless, many of them failed to forecast the 2007 recession.
However, the effects of the credit panic of 2008, together with the great uncertainties created by government over taxes, regulation and Obamacare, have left the consumer wary. The Federal Reserve's infusion of large sums of synthetic cash into the economy has bypassed ordinary people, creating an enormous and increasingly politically sensitive wealth divide. Real median household income remains at 1995 levels.
Nearly $150 billion in new taxes likely will be paid for from savings. Later, they will they be reflected in reduced consumer demand. This portends destruction $450 billion in consumer demand, starting near the end of 2013.
Already, anemic growth in gross domestic product highlights serious economic underperformance, rising by only 1.6 percent in the past year — far below the 223-year average of 3.8 percent. Reduced demand will worsen this situation.
Further, foreign economies are experiencing recession, reflected in falling commodity prices.
Unlike short-term rates, long-term bond yield reflects investors' expectations of perceived inflation rather than government- financed demand. This is crucial to gauging the interest rate outlook.
The popular misconception was that the Fed's injection of cash was inflationary. The yield curve steepened as long-bond yields rose. Conversely, talk of “tapering” off by the Fed is misconstrued as a sign that less government stimulus will lead to increased yields. Investors may soon recognize reduced Fed action as deflationary and buy long-term bonds, driving yields down.
Because of huge debt and serious mortgage default rates, the government cannot afford higher interest rates. Therefore, latent economic pressures for lower interest rates are increasing.
With GDP growth threatened by shrinking consumer demand and spreading international recession, it is likely that recession — rather than inflation — will threaten the major economies first.
If the popular outlook for inflation is replaced by fears of recession and lower interest rates, homebuyers and bondholders may get a second chance.
John Browne, a former member of Britain's Parliament, is a financial and economics columnist for Trib Total Media. Email him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Garden Q&A: Firecracker vine OK for trellis?
- MLB notebook: Dodgers ace Kershaw pitches simulated game
- Penguins notebook: Gibbons day-to-day after Game 2 injury
- Cole’s strong outing wasted in 14-inning loss
- Starkey: Penguins’ arrogance astounding
- Fix the 2nd Amendment with 5 words
- Pirates notebook: No rush to judgment by Hurdle
- Egg decorating turns to fight, charges in Brookline, police say
- Matt Calvert’s goal in double OT evens series for Blue Jackets
- Three ejected after Pirates, Brewers brawl
- Draftees’ longevity key for NFL success