Wendy's fastest, Burger King least precise among drive-thrus
By Tiffany Hsu
Published: Saturday, Oct. 13, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
In less time than it takes some computers to power up, Wendy's can get a customer in and out of its drive-thru.
The fast food chain needed 129.75 seconds to clear a car through its queue last year — 16 seconds better than 2010, and faster than any other major chain, according to an annual report from QSR Magazine.
Chick-fil-A takes slightly longer — 190.06 seconds, or just over 3 minutes — to do the same. But the chicken company has the best accuracy ratings, getting 92.4 percent of drive-thru orders correct.
Less impressive: Burger King, which requires 201.33 seconds to serve car-bound customers and has the worst precision record. The chain correctly delivers 83 percent of its drive-thru orders, down 6.7 percentage points from 2010.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Expert: KO doesn’t mean ‘worst’ concussion for Pens’ Orpik
- Penguins’ Neal suspended five games for Marchand hit
- City Council approves 32 amendments to proposed 2014 budget
- UPMC doctor killed trying to help at 50-vehicle pileup
- Woman sues California borough, police chief, claims they failed to protect her from sexual assault
- Sewickley Township worker accused of threats seeks pre-trial program
- Steelers WR Brown says ‘I thought I had it clean’ after wild, near-miss finish
- Kovacevic: Enough of these Steelers already
- The day the Holocaust began
- Aliquippa’s Henry picks West Virginia over Pitt
- Police: Argument between exes sparked kidnapping, chase and fatal shooting