State economy improved, jobless rate fell to 7.8% in November
The number of unemployed Pennsylvania residents fell by 16,000 in November, the largest single month decline since 1983 and the second-largest drop on record, said a report on Friday.
“That 16,000 is a healthy number,” said labor economist Mark Price, of the Keystone Research Center, Harrisburg.
“It's a sign we're back on track,” he said. “This is a nice reversal back in the right direction after the number of unemployed had been rising over the summer.”
The jobless rate also fell sharply to 7.8 percent last month from 8.1 percent in October, according to the state Department of Labor and Industry report.
The economist said the only time that Pennsylvania logged a larger drop in unemployed people was in July 1983, when jobless ranks fell by about 100,000. That drop occurred because the implosion of Big Steel at the time led thousands of suddenly jobless people to leave Pennsylvania for states with better prospects, he said.
Total employment in November, adjusted for seasonal fluctuations, stood at 5.75 million, which was the highest level in four years, or since November 2008. Employment is determined by a survey of state residents.
Private-sector jobs, determined by a survey of employers, increased by 7,200 last month, driven primarily by gains in leisure and hospitality, education and health services, and manufacturing.
“The public sector shed 5,300 jobs, but the private sector added 7,200, which is a good number,” Price said.
“But I don't think this will be repeated in December,” he said.
“The Pennsylvania economy is slowly recovering, and we are adding jobs, but not at a pace where we'd sustain November's really good number.”
Thomas Olson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7854 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.