Equitable Gas seeking 14-cent monthly repair charge
Equitable Gas wants to raise residential customers' bills by an average 14 cents a month to pay for multimillion-dollar pipeline replacement projects.
The North Shore-based natural gas utility filed an application with the Public Utility Commission late Tuesday to assess a distribution system improvement charge, as allowed under a new state law.
The 14-cent rate is based on a customer who uses 90 thousand cubic feet, or mcf, a year. The PUC must approve the charge. Equitable plans to spend $23.7 million in 2013 to replace aging pipelines.
Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania wants a 62-cent charge, on average. Peoples Natural Gas Co. expects to apply to the PUC for its charge by the end of the week. The fees are designed to bypass costly rate approval proceedings.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.