ShareThis Page

EQT gets Sustainable Shale certification

| Monday, April 18, 2016, 12:27 p.m.

A collaborative effort between shale gas producers and nonprofits aimed at encouraging drilling policies that protect land, air and water has issued certifications to its fourth industry partner.

Downtown-based EQT Corp. received the Center for Sustainable Shale Development's approval after undergoing an outside review of its environmental policies and practices, the group said Monday. The certification process, which is voluntary, involves an evaluation based on 15 standards that the center wrote.

EQT joins fellow founding partners Chevron, Consol Energy and Royal Dutch Shell in receiving the certification. The center said those other companies recently completed audits of their operations showing they remain in compliance with standards.

“EQT's certification, and the other operators who have qualified for certification and continue to maintain conformance to CSSD's standards, reinforces the importance and value of responsible voluntary actions and transparency that goes beyond simple compliance,” center director Susan LeGros said in an announcement.

The center has been looking for other producers and nonprofits to join the collaborative. In addition to the energy companies, participants include the Benedum Foundation, Clean Air Task Force, Environmental Defense Fund, the Group Against Smog and Pollution, and the Pennsylvania Environmental Council.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.