Share This Page

Samsung considers split, tweaks shareholder return plans

| Tuesday, Nov. 29, 2016, 9:36 p.m.
In this Oct. 26, 2016 file photo, a visitor walks by Samsung Electronics TV screens at Korea Electronics Show or KES in Seoul, South Korea. Samsung Electronics said Tuesday, Nov. 29, it will increase shareholder returns and review its corporate structure.

Samsung Electronics revealed Tuesday it is considering whether to split into two companies in an effort to boost long-term value for shareholders.

In a statement, Samsung says among options for improving shareholder value is to create a “holding company structure.” Samsung is also exploring whether to list the company's shares on more international exchanges.

Samsung will beef up its shareholder return program, introduced last year. The company says it will increase dividends this year by 30 percent, bringing the annual amount to $3.4 billion. They will also start quarterly dividend payments in April, and allocate 50 percent of free cash flow in 2016 and 2017 to shareholder returns.

“We are committed to enhancing sustainable long-term value for our shareholders and to remaining good stewards of capital,” Dr. Oh-Hyun Kwon, CEO and vice chairman of Samsung Electronics, said in a statement Tuesday.

The push to boost shareholder value arrives after a pair of recalls by Samsung as well as a push by investor Elliott Management to shake up its corporate structure.

Elliott Management submitted proposals in October urging Samsung to initiate a split into a listed holding company and an operations company.

“Now is the time for real shareholder value, corporate governance and transparency improvements, which we believe will help Samsung Electronics achieve an equity market valuation that properly reflects its first-class portfolio of businesses,” a portion of the October letter said.

“We view the plan outlined by Samsung to be a constructive initial step,” Elliott affiliates Blake Capital and Potter Capital, through which the investment was made, said in an emailed statement.

During the 2015 fiscal year, Samsung reported annual revenue of $171 billion, down from the previous year, with a stake in several businesses from electronics and smartphones to even life insurance.

A split could allow Samsung to better specialize, said Holger Mueller, an analyst at Constellation Research. “The sum of the parts is more valuable than the whole thing together.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.