ShareThis Page

Airfares for many travelers rise due to bag fees

| Saturday, Sept. 23, 2017, 6:48 p.m.
Travelers who check at least one bag when flying domestically are paying more overall than they did before airlines began unbundling fares in 2008 and charging separately for checked baggage, a government watchdog said Wednesday, Sept. 20, 2017.
Travelers who check at least one bag when flying domestically are paying more overall than they did before airlines began unbundling fares in 2008 and charging separately for checked baggage, a government watchdog said Wednesday, Sept. 20, 2017.

WASHINGTON — Travelers who check at least one bag when flying domestically are paying more overall than they did before airlines began unbundling fares in 2008 and charging separately for checked baggage, a government watchdog said Wednesday.

A report by the Government Accountability Office said airline officials told GAO investigators that base air fares are now lower than before airlines began separately charging passengers for checked bags, reservation changes, priority boarding and other services. But the GAO's review of studies that have examined the effect of bag fees on ticket prices shows that charging separately for bags reduced fares by less than the new bag fee itself.

“As a result, customers who paid for checked bags paid more on average for the combined airfare and bag fee than when the airfare and bag fee were bundled together,” the report said. “Conversely, passengers who did not check bags paid less overall.”

One study found that airlines with bag fees lowered fares to appear more competitive and then made up the lost revenue in bag fees. Another study found that declines in airfares amounted to less than the bag fee, so on average the combined total of the fare and bag fee increased.

Airlines collected $7.1 billion in revenue from checked bag and changed reservations fees in the federal budget year ending on Sept. 30, 2016, the GAO said. Those are the only fee revenues that airlines are required to report to the government.

The Department of Transportation said Wednesday that airlines collected nearly $1.2 in checked bag fees during the seconded quarter of this year. That's a record and the fifth consecutive quarter that bag fee revenues exceeded $1 billion.

“At this rate, passengers are going to have to start showing up with a suitcase full of clothes and a suitcase full of money just to get on the plane,” said Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., who requested the report. “It's high time the airlines rein in these outrageous fees.”

Airlines for America, a trade association, said fares are “historically low and have trended that way since deregulation” in 1978.

The group, citing federal figures, noted that “we are in the third consecutive year of real declines in domestic airfares, and year after year we continue to see record numbers of flyers taking to the skies.”

But the report said the Transportation Department's data had serious limitations that may cause fares to appear lower than they actually are.

Consumer advocates and online travel agents also told GAO investigators that the proliferation of new fees for services means flyers aren't always able to determine the full cost of their travel and compare prices across airlines before buying tickets.

“Consumers should be able to shop for airline seats without being nickel-and-dimed, and without getting hit with post-purchase sticker shock,” William J. McGee, an aviation adviser to Consumer Reports magazine, said in a statement following the release of the report. He called for “basic standards to curb these unfair practices.”

Congress told the Transportation Department to issue new rules requiring quick automatic refunds for bag fees when checked luggage isn't delivered, but the department hasn't yet acted on the directive.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.