Report: Pennsylvania's business climate remains unfriendly
Pennsylvania is home to the second-highest corporate tax rate in the country, a dubious distinction that saps its ability to lure employers seeking a business-friendly climate to open or grow, according to a report released Tuesday by the Tax Foundation, a Washington-based think tank.
“Even in our global economy, a state's strongest and most immediate competition often comes from other states,” said Scott Drenkard, an economist with the Tax Foundation.
It's not all bad news.
Pennsylvania placed 19th among 50 states and the District of Columbia when the study took into account personal income, excise and business tax rates. It cited Pennsylvania's 3.07 flat personal income tax rate, one of the lowest in the country, and a mid-range base sales tax of 6 percent as points that offset the state's poor showing in the corporate tax category.
Pennsylvania's corporate net income tax of 9.99 percent produced $2.13 billion in the 2010-11 fiscal year, up from $1.79 billion in 2009-10, records show. Only Iowa imposes a higher corporate rate at 12 percent.
“It's why we have to outright bribe businesses to move here,” said Leo Knepper, executive director of Citizens Alliance of Pennsylvania, a nonprofit group that promotes small-government policies. “If we would take the energy that we're putting into these targeted incentives and make the tax climate more competitive, we'd be a lot better off.”
Knepper cited D.G. Yuengling & Sons owner Dick Yuengling's recent comments that he would likely expand beer-making operations next year outside Pennsylvania because other states offer more competitive tax rates and incentives. Yuengling, founded in Pottsville, became the nation's largest American-owned brewery last year.
Michael Wood, a researcher with the Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center, a liberal think tank, said the tax environment isn't as dire as the Tax Foundation's report suggests. He said few corporations actually pay the full 9.99 percent because of loopholes and exceptions, and recent changes to the tax code are phasing out the capital stock and franchise tax by 2014, which taxes a corporation's capital stock value.
“The share of what they've been paying for in the total budget has been going down for many years,” Wood said. “That revenue was not replaced, and businesses have gotten a pretty good deal with some of the other tax changes that have happened. They haven't gotten to the corporate income tax rate yet, but it's really because (the state) can't afford to do it.”
Each percentage point decrease of the corporate tax rate would cost the state about $250 million in revenue, a tough hurdle since Pennsylvania is required to pass a balanced budget each year, said Sam Denisco, vice president of government affairs with the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry.
“It's a major deterrent to business attraction and expansion,” Denisco said.
Legislation that would have reduced the rate to 6.99 percent over six years failed to receive approval in the state Senate this year. But other business-friendly tax reforms passed as part of Gov. Tom Corbett's 2013 budget package, said Steve Kratz, a spokesman for the Department of Community and Economic Development.
“Our history of being a high business tax and high regulatory state is going to take some time to overcome,” Kratz said.
Kratz noted legislation Corbett signed that eliminates the inheritance tax and real estate transfer tax on family farms and taxes Pennsylvania companies based solely on sales, rather than also on the number of employees and buildings.
“We have a much better business climate than we did when Corbett took office,” Kratz said.
Jeremy Boren is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7935 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Chevron settles fatal shale gas well fire lawsuit for $5M
- Task force to plot ways of easing gas glut in Pennsylvania via pipelines
- IRS cybersecurity breach touches lives of homebuyers, others
- Pitt study suggests health law attracting young to balance insurers’ risks
- UPMC offering buyouts to 3,500 employees in cost-cutting move
- Shoppers pay premium for organic chicken
- Many Americans have no retirement savings, Fed survey shows
- Tesla home battery at $7K, partnered with rooftop solar system, may help reduce power bills
- Automakers do U-turn on infotainment systems
- Apple finds bug that causes iPhones to crash
- Stocks bounce back from losses on reassurance from Greece