Airlines' fees to rise as Airport Authority adopts 2013 budget
The Allegheny County Airport Authority on Friday adopted a $159.6 million operating budget for next year that increases airlines' cost of doing business at Pittsburgh International Airport.
The spending plan boosts airlines' per-passenger costs 2.7 percent to $14.66, up from $14.28 this year. Costs include landing fees and renting space in the air-side terminal and on the airport ramp.
The increase might have been larger, but board Chairman David Minnotte said the authority has “better controlled costs and improved revenues.”
Overall, next year's budget and debt payments will be 3.3 percent, or $5.1 million, higher than this year's.
A bulk of the increase — or $3.8 million — will be used to make payments on a $50 million bond issued this year for facility improvements.
That will increase the authority's debt payment to $65.7 million. Most of it is related to the $1 billion construction of the airside and landside terminals two decades ago.
The authority also adopted a $35.5 million budget for facility improvements next year, including repairs to people-mover trains that travel between Pittsburgh International's two terminals, replacing guard shacks around the airport's perimeter and terminal improvements.
Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Safety of credit cards up to banks
- 2 Fed members push case for rate hike in ’15
- Travelers love to hate cheap airlines
- Volkswagen may compensate vehicle owners for loss of value, CEO says
- Majority of House members sign petition calling for vote on Export-Import Bank’s charter
- UAW ups Fiat Chrysler workers’ pay in new proposal
- ‘Coffin-nosed Cord’ was ahead of its time
- Miata leaves cutesy behind for sleek
- Stocks wrap best week of year with slight gains
- PNC fined for paperwork errors on municipal bond offerings
- ZeroFossil Energy Outfitters powers up with renewable sources