Retailers struggle to curb shoplifting, fraud
Fraud, theft and other preventable losses drain billions of dollars from retailers nationwide as shops confront increasingly sophisticated criminals bent on looting shelves.
A December study by the Centre for Retail Research on behalf of New Jersey-based Checkpoint Systems, a global leader in fighting retail crime, estimated that America's shops lost $8.9 billion during the holiday season to shoplifters, vendor fraud, deceitful employees and other problems. That added $98 to each family's shopping bill as stores tried to recoup losses.The research echoed the National Retail Security Survey published in June by the National Retail Federation and the University of Florida. It pegged losses for America's 3.6 million retailers at $35 billion in 2011.
There is some good news: The losses in 2011 were down $3.5 billion from those in 2008, when the recession began. Experts credit an increase in shops' spending on guards and anti-crime gadgets that were cut from corporate budgets during the recession.
“It's a combination of things. We're seeing more money spent on loss prevention. That's been notching up every year,” said Richard Mellor, vice president for Loss Prevention at the Washington-based National Retail Federation.
Key security innovations include anti-theft alarms hidden in products; software that mines sales data, inventory logs and video footage to flag shoplifters and dishonest employees; and increased information sharing between retailers and law enforcement to identify criminal suspects before they strike again.
“Retailers are paying more attention to what shrinkage means to the bottom line,” said Dan Reynolds, vice president of North American Sales and Customer Service for Checkpoint Systems.
The rise of organized crime rings is harder to halt.
The National Retail Security Survey revealed that 96 percent of retailers were victimized by packs of professional pilferers in 2011, perhaps looting as much as $12 billion.
Moving from state to state, the shoplifters often distract employees before snatching consumer goods they can fenced easily, especially online. Their top targets: Alcohol, clothing, toys, perfume, DVDs, hardware, watches and chocolates, according to Checkpoint, which designed ways to identify the criminals' tools when they enter a store.
“We have to keep one step ahead of them,” Reynolds said.Ross Township Police Department officers try to do just that.
Dramatic heists, such as an autumn spree that targeted the Best Buy electronics store on McKnight Road or the theft of handbags from the Louis Vuitton store in Ross Park Mall in November, attract media attention, but police spend most of their time working with stores to prevent crime and quickly investigate shoplifting bands, then disseminate information about them.“It's an issue for any township or municipality that has the number of retail stores that we do. Our problem is no different than any other community with many strip malls, malls and others retail outlets,” said Ross police Sgt. Benjamin Dripps.
Best Buy's theft ring remains at large but Dripps said police still are looking for them.“We do many large-scale investigations. But we always also work closely with the anchor stores at the malls and the shops in strip malls. They're familiar with our policies and know what we can do with them when we arrive.”
Carl Prine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7826 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Farmers fear 2nd attack of bird flu
- Toyota to invest $50M in driverless technology with Stanford, MIT partnership
- Bank of New York Mellon computer glitch examined for harm to investors
- Voice-assist technology gets big push toward mainstream vehicles
- U.S. adds 173,000 jobs in August, dropping unemployment rate to 5.1 percent
- Jobs report fails to provide clarity to investors
- Is safety impaired when braking makes car shake?
- Save big money with comparable model of vehicle
- Alcoa putting $60M into Upper Burrell tech center expansion
- Trimmer Pilot belies more room, power
- Shale gas violations down as DEP steps up inspections