Roth IRA may offer an answer
Q: I'm 24, married with a child and in medical school. Thanks to my wonderful parents, I will graduate with no debt. I'd like to start saving for retirement now. I don't have a job, so I can't use a 401(k) or Roth IRA. Is there another account I could use that wouldn't be taxed, and how should I invest?
A: Congratulations for thinking ahead. With Social Security and Medicare threatened, your generation is going to need to do more saving for retirement than the previous one. So starting now — even if it's just $5 a week — will help tremendously.
A 24-year-old who invests just $5 a week in a stock market index mutual fund and keeps it up year after year should have more than $130,000 by retirement. Investing $20 a week should provide more than $500,000 by retirement. Yet a person who waits until age 45 to start saving is not likely to accumulate $500,000, even by investing $150 a week. Try it with this calculator: http://bit.ly/cSYagW.
You are wise to want to invest in a 401(k), Roth IRA or another account that is not taxed. Your money accumulates much faster when you aren't giving part of it to Uncle Sam each year, and the two accounts you mentioned do keep the taxman away.
But as you point out, you are not earning money now, so — on the basis of your income — the Internal Revenue Service won't let you open an IRA or Roth IRA and shield your savings from taxes.
You might have an option to keep Uncle Sam away.
Even though you are not working, you can open a Roth IRA and contribute up to $5,000 this year if your spouse has a job or business and is earning $5,000 or more a year at work. Your spouse can also open a Roth IRA and contribute up to $5,000, provided his/her income from working is high enough to cover the contributions.
In other words, the two of you could be saving a total of $10,000 this year in accounts that will never be taxed. Roth IRAs are not taxed if you leave money invested in them until you are at least 59 1⁄2 years old. If you have $500,000 at retirement, it will be yours free and clear if it's in a Roth. If it's a million, $3 million or any amount, the money in your Roth will be all yours — free of taxes — unless the government changes the promises it has made.
Next year, with your spouse working, you two can put away a total of $11,000 in Roth IRAs. That's $5,500 for each of you. In 2013, the government is raising the maximum contribution for Roth IRAs to $5,500 per person.
If you and your spouse don't have jobs, you won't be able to shield your money from taxes in an IRA. But unless you have received a huge inheritance or other gift of money, you probably won't have to worry about taxes until you have a job.
Then you can start saving regularly in a 401(k) at work, and you can open Roth IRAs if your income is within the limits — currently $173,000 for a couple contributing $5,000 each.
Meanwhile, you can get started saving in a taxable account. Keeping your fees low is important. So consider going to a mutual fund company such as Vanguard, which is known for low fees. If you invest in an index mutual fund, your fees will be very low.
Gail MarksJarvis is a personal finance columnist for the Chicago Tribune and author of “Saving for Retirement Without Living Like a Pauper or Winning the Lottery.” Email herat email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Energy sector adjusts to global oil plummet
- New York farmers lament lost opportunity for gas riches
- EPA says it won’t regulate coal ash as hazardous waste
- Real estate union: Howard Hanna buys Langholz Wilson Ellis
- ‘Staff Pick’ is golden ticket on Kickstarter
- Drought opens Texas ranchers’ eyes to income options
- U.S. coal mines nearing record low in worker deaths
- Natural gas groups says increase in Pennsylvania taxes would bring dire results for economy
- Kim Komando: Can you get a virus on your smartphone?
- As smokers seek Cuban cigars, retailers point to trade embargo
- ExOne Co. moves solidify authority under CEO