ShareThis Page

Wind energy credit near expiration

| Saturday, Dec. 8, 2012, 12:01 a.m.

Amid the “fiscal cliff” drama on Capitol Hill, there's a behind-the-scenes push to extend a lucrative tax credit that has helped propel a recent boom in the wind industry.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers aims to attach a one-year extension of the credit, slated to expire at the end of December, to a broad budget deal that would avert the fiscal cliff's tax increases and spending cuts.

What if Congress and President Obama can't reach an overall deal?

“Wind would take a hit,” said Michael Bernier, who analyzes renewable energy tax credits for Ernst & Young, a global accounting firm.

Bernier said the tax credit has helped the wind industry expand quickly and slash prices. Projected to add a record 13 megawatts of power this year, the industry has accounted for one-third of new U.S. power generation in the last five years.

Without the credit, Bernier said, the industry will contract, adding that the extent will depend partly on competing prices for natural gas. Government data show the 20-year-old production tax credit, which cuts the cost of a wind project by nearly a third, has expired three times before: in 2000, 2002 and 2004. Wind production plummeted the year after each lapse by 93 percent, 73 percent and 77 percent, respectively.

“It (another expiration) would be devastating. ... Half the jobs in the industry could be lost within a year,” said Robert Gramlich of the American Wind Energy Industry Association, an industry group.

Gramlich points to a report by Navigant Consulting that estimates an expiration would kill 37,000 jobs by the end of March, whereas a renewal could add up to 100,000 jobs in four years.

The uncertainty over the wind credit has caused thousands of wind workers to lose their jobs.

this year, Gramlich said, citing recent layoffs by wind turbine manufacturers Siemens Wind Power and Katana Summit.

“A lot of people are nervous there won't be an extension. ... We're seeing people diversify into solar,” Bernier said. Unlike the 2.2-cents-a-kilowatt-hour wind credit, which has been subject to one-year, last-minute renewals, the solar industry enjoys an investor tax credit of 30 percent through 2016.

The wind industry should receive consistent tax breaks, as do other energy sectors, including the $4 billion or so in annual subsidies received by the oil and gas industries since the 1960s, Gramlich said.

Critics say it's time to end the wind tax credit, estimated to cost taxpayers $1.3 billion this year alone. They say the wind industry, which provides about 3 percent of U.S. electricity, should be mature enough to compete without training wheels.

“This is an example of a program that's run its course,” said Thomas Pyle, president of the American Energy Alliance, a group funded partly by oil interests that's lobbying against the tax credit. Pyle said the wind industry is using its subsidy to underbid other energy sectors and manipulate the market.

Richard Caperton, an energy expert at the liberal-leaning Center for American Progress, said the wind credit may be forcing lower energy prices and corporate profits but not to an extent that harms energy reliability. He said the nuclear and hydropower industries also use subsidies to bid for contracts at below-zero or negative pricing.

If there's a deal on the fiscal cliff, many observers expect a one-year extension will pass because of its bipartisan support.

“Wind blows in the rural areas where there are a lot of Republicans,” Pyle said.

Advocates for the credit include GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley and Rep. Steve King, both of Iowa, which received about 20 percent of its power last year from wind.

Douglas Egan, who develops wind and natural gas projects as co-founder of Competitive Power Ventures, is less optimistic. He said the typical one-year extension is “almost worthless” because it requires new wind projects be completed within a year in order to benefit. He said it often takes longer than that.

“Sooner or later, we have to stand on our own feet,” Egan said, adding that the wind industry could manage a gradual step-down in subsidies.

The tax credit — if extended — might have more helpful language this time, said Gramlich, the industry advocate. By a 19-5 vote in August, the Senate Finance Committee approved an extension that requires wind projects be started — but not necessarily completed — by the end of 2013 to qualify for the credit.

The fiscal cliff adds drama to the 2012 debate, but extensions often come down to the wire, he noted. Prior renewals have come, on average, seven days before expiration.

“It's very common to be in this exact position,” Gramlich said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.