Cliff causes rift over taxes
WASHINGTON — The fiscal cliff debate is splitting the business community over taxes, driving a wedge between two natural Republican allies: the nation's corporate leaders who are helping strengthen President Obama's bargaining position and the small-business advocates bristling over the prospect of higher taxes.
Obama has been courting top CEOs, inviting them to the White House for “fiscal cliff” consultations, and they have responded by being open to Obama's demand that tax rates go up on household income above $250,000. In turn, Obama has promised to consider changes in the tax code that would lower corporate tax rates.
Most small businesses, however, pay at individual income tax rates, and the biggest earners among them would have to pay higher taxes if Obama succeeds in winning an increase in the top two marginal tax rates. They could face even higher tax payments if an overhaul of the tax code does away with business deductions or credits they now claim.
“This sort of laser like focus on corporate-only tax reform that we keep seeing coupled with revenues on the individual side is definitely a concern for us,” said Chris Whitcomb, the top tax lawyer at the National Federation of Independent Business.
Leading Republicans have been quick to portray the rift in populist terms, casting Obama as a big business ally and the GOP as champions of small businesses.
For Obama, it is an unlikely role that underscores his complicated relationship with the business community. Republicans in the past have criticized him for not consulting enough with the private sector.
Early in his term, Obama characterized Wall Street executives and bankers as “fat cats,” and he has singled out oil and gas companies for their tax subsidies. But he has won appreciation for expanding the government rescue of the auto industry and has promoted some tax breaks for small business.
Most recently, 158 CEOs from major corporations — all members of the influential Business Roundtable — signed a letter to Obama and Congress voicing support for tax revenue “whether by increasing rates, eliminating deductions, or some combination thereof.” The stance put them at odds with House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and the Senate's Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who repeatedly have voiced opposition to raising tax rates.
Coinciding with this week's business support was Obama's new fiscal cliff offer specifying his willingness to make changes in corporate taxes in 2013. But the offer included proposals Obama has been making for some time, including a 28 percent tax rate, down from 35 percent, for most corporations and a goal of 25 percent for manufacturers.
White House aides, however, say Obama will not yield on one key demand from multinational companies: their desire for a system that doesn't tax them in America for profits earned overseas. It's an idea Obama's own Export Council has endorsed. Small-business advocates argue that large corporations might get the tax changes they want at the expense of small businesses.
“Higher rates and more revenue threatens corporate tax reform,” said Rep. Dave Camp, chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. “There just isn't enough the president can take out from small businesses and from individuals to get all the revenue he wants.”
Indeed, Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation estimates Obama's proposal would hit about 940,000 people who report business income on their individual or household tax returns.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Visa limits vex businesses
- Camera prevalence approaches sci-fi realm
- Experts: If health insurers’ safeguard goes broke, consumers could pay
- Rules could kick door open for nuclear power
- Scented society is killing cheap perfume industry
- Nike, Under Armour invest in watching exercisers’ steps
- ‘Promposals’ can be small as burritos, big as Jumbotrons
- Paper’s prevalence unlikely to diminish
- Tech sector drives gains on Wall Street
- Mylan raises bid for fellow drugmaker; Perrigo says ‘no’
- MedExpress bought by United Health Group