Build yourself a pre-retirement nest
My husband and I paid our annual visit to the financial adviser who watches over our undoubtedly inadequate retirement savings, an appointment that is not unlike those with the dentist: necessary but never fun.
During our meeting, I proudly listed the home maintenance projects I had undertaken as our retirement approaches — painting the interior and the exterior of the house, replacing the fence, updating the kitchen a bit, and having the appliances and heating and air-conditioning units checked to see if I need to buy new ones.
Better to pay the cost of those chores while we are still collecting paychecks, I said, instead of taking the money out of savings once our time in the shrinking world of newspapers comes to an end.
I thought I was so smart. I figured that every penny we spent now on maintaining our major asset, our home, was a penny less we would have to pay out on a fixed income.
“Pre-retirement nesting,” our adviser said with a smile. “I see it all the time.”
After the sting passed of learning that I was not so clever, I was curious.
Nesting? That's a term used to describe the behavior of pregnant women in the days and weeks before they are due to deliver. I'd never heard it used to describe people on the cusp of retirement.
I thought “empty nesters” was the term they used to describe us, not “nesters.” I thought we were the group that was downsizing and de-cluttering, not fluffing.
Check every retirement checklist out there, and you won't find “fix the fence” on any. All of them tell you to “create a realistic budget,” but none of them says, “Check the dryer to see if it will need to be replaced soon.”
Review your life insurance needs, sure. But where do they tell you to replace the kitchen counter with granite because nobody will buy your house unless you do?
“You are doing the right thing,” said Christine Fahlund, senior financial planner with T. Rowe Price and an expert on retirement issues.
“All the big-ticket items should be paid for while you are working so your investments can continue to grow.”
She made the comparison to the crash of 2008: Most portfolios lost 20 percent, but are slowly recovering.
“Compare that with drawing down your portfolio by $10,000 or $15,000 or more to do these things. That money is gone; it is spent. There is no rebound. And that is much more significant than what happened in 2008.”
It is part of putting our financial house in order — by putting our actual house in order. We are doing these projects at the best possible time, while we have the income to pay for them and the time to enjoy them.
Susan Reimer writes for The Baltimore Sun.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Drenching rains green pastures, bode well for cattle herd expansion in Great Plains
- Financial planning for disabled people a little-tapped field
- How to cover work history gaps
- AT&T evolves beyond phones
- This robot is cute, artificially intelligent and employed
- FAA: Cockpit email system reduces delays
- Taxes matter in fund investing, even when there’s no bill
- Keep pesky neighbors from stealing your Internet
- Pa. sees widespread job gains; jobless rate holds at 5.3%
- Shareholder vote causes ATI to review executive pay packages
- Parent of Lane Bryant, Justice to buy owner of Ann Taylor for $2B