Economists uncertain about economic direction
WASHINGTON — Most forecasters are looking at 2013 as being another mediocre year for the economy, but many appear hopeful that growth will accelerate as the year progresses.
Beyond that broad outline, the outlook for next year is muddled. The range of economic growth projections is about as wide as it's ever been, reflecting the great fiscal haze hanging over the nation.
In its year-end survey released Monday, the National Association for Business Economics said the consensus view from its panel of forecasters shows gross domestic product expanding next year at an average annual growth rate of 2.1 percent. That's little changed from the modest 2.2 percent pace this year.
And don't expect the unemployment rate to budge. Most of the 48 professional economists expect the jobless rate to average 7.7 percent in 2013 — exactly where it stands now.
Those numbers represent the consensus or median, which means half the experts are predicting GDP growth stronger than 2.1 percent next year and half predict growth below 2.1 percent. But what's striking about the survey results are the varying views from the economists, who work at companies, universities and government.
Although they predict GDP to grow in the fourth quarter of 2013 from the same period in 2012, five of the forecasters on the panel think growth will come in at 3.6 percent, while five others expect the increase to be a mere 1.3 percent.
The top and bottom range of forecasts for job growth is just as stark. Some predict the nation will add on average 300,000 jobs a month in the second half of next year, but the pessimistic five believe payrolls will rise by no more than 125,000 a month in that period.
“It just shows there's a lot of uncertainty among economists,” said Nayantara Hensel, with the association's outlook survey and professor of business at National Defense University.
Much of that uncertainty, of course, is over the looming “fiscal cliff” — deep federal budgets cuts and tax increases that would take effect at the start of next year unless the White House and congressional Republicans can agree on how to avert the fall.
Progress in the talks has been slow since the survey was taken in the second half of November. So it's unlikely the economists' views have changed much since then.
At that time, most of the forecasters were betting that big chunks of the tax increases would take place. Three-quarters of the panelists figured the payroll tax cut would expire at year-end, which would slice an average worker's take-home pay by about $1,000 over the full year. What's more, most don't expect the federal income tax cuts made a decade ago to survive, either.
On top of that, many of the economists expect things in Europe to get worse, and they think that growth in U.S. corporate after-tax profits will dip to 5 percent in 2013 from 8.5 percent this year. Further improvement in the American housing market is one of the few things looking up for the recovery.
All of which raises the question: Are even these mediocre economic growth projections too optimistic?
Hensel thinks so. She points out that concerns and uncertainty over the fiscal cliff already have taken a big bite out of business investments.
and are weighing on consumers as well, especially those who work in government.
“It's not clear what's coming in the new year,” she said. “Is there going to be a furlough? Are government funds not going to be cut? We don't know.”
She added: “Personally, I believe we're going to have a recession.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.S. employers add 223K jobs, jobless rate falls to 5.3%
- Gulf states reach $18.7B settlement with BP over oil spill
- Kraft shareholders approve merger with Heinz
- H-D Advanced Manufacturing in Franklin Park buys aerospace components maker Firstmark
- Rules holding for-profit schools accountable for student earnings go into effect
- Alpha Natural Resources buys out European partner in Marcellus venture
- Halliburton to close Indiana County office
- June manufacturing growth shows expansion
- Government contests sale of GE appliance business to competitor Electrolux
- SEC votes to expand clawbacks of executive bonuses
- Drillers to submit electronic records on fracking chemicals to Pa. DEP