Be mindful now to avoid audits, penalties
Here's a group of 1 percenters no one wants to join: the group of taxpayers to be audited by the Internal Revenue Service next year.
• Certain types of writeoffs are going to raise red flags with the IRS, according to this article at U.S. News & World Report. It suggests that you should expect the tax collector to verify such things as a claimed Earned Income Credit or an adoption credit. More important for many taxpayers is the need now to collect receipts for charitable gifts. If you file a return next year after simply guessing at the amount of your contributions to church or other charities, and you get audited, the IRS will disallow the deduction. bit.ly/z3s9gR
•“Making too much money” is the enviable topper to a Kiplinger list of a dozen “audit red flags.” If an overly fat paycheck is not your problem, there are plenty of other issues that can trip you up, including off-the-wall deductions for money you spent on a hobby or simply running a cash business. bit.ly/e2OMvi
• The IRS hosts something called the Taxpayer Advocate Service, which might sound like a case of the fox watching the henhouse. Still, the service, which reports independently to Congress, was set up as a place to turn when individuals feel they've hit brick walls with the tax-collection agency. You can go to this site for links on how to ask for help or to report what you might think is a systemic problem at the IRS. www.irs.gov/advocate
• Here, in a pdf file, is the most recent taxpayer-advocate report to Congress. It warns that late-year tax-law changes may delay tax filings in 2013, and that the IRS needs to beef up its assistance of the victims of identity theft, among many findings: 1.usa.gov/L1PCDV
• Tax-law expert Dean Zerbe posted this Forbes item on avoiding audits. He cites a taxpayer advocate's report to say good records are, bottom line, the best way to be sure you are paying what you owe and can defend your figures if it comes to that. “It is not a helpful story if the taxpayer points to an empty shoe box as holding the justification for the position taken on a return,” Zerbe notes. onforb.es/zHJ4k4
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bank of New York Mellon computer glitch examined for harm to investors
- Voice-assist technology gets big push toward mainstream vehicles
- Save big money with comparable model of vehicle
- Farmers fear 2nd attack of bird flu
- Toyota to invest $50M in driverless technology with Stanford, MIT partnership
- Is safety impaired when braking makes car shake?
- U.S. adds 173,000 jobs in August, dropping unemployment rate to 5.1 percent
- Jobs report fails to provide clarity to investors
- Trimmer Pilot belies more room, power
- PPG’s new CEO to push organic growth with existing clients
- Macy’s prepares outlet stores