Chevy Spark screams spunk
By Larry Printz The Virginian-pilot
Published: Friday, Dec. 28, 2012, 8:58 p.m.
City dwellers and those who have trouble parallel parking: Rejoice! Chevrolet has introduced the Spark, the first minicar that the bow-tie brand has sold in the United States.
Looking like a Chevrolet Sonic that was left in the dryer too long, the aggressively sculpted styling makes the most of the available sheet metal, despite clownishly oversized headlights that are the same length as the hood of the car. Still, the Spark has a distinctively spunky look despite its short-but-tall stance and feminine colors.
Climbing inside, there are no mock metallic accents or leather seating surfaces. Instead, this car's honest design reflects its price in the pecking order. The overall design is fun and strangely refreshing.
That all said, I wasn't thrilled to find a four-speed automatic transmission on the test car. While good for an EPA rating of 28 mpg city, 37 highway, the five-speed manual transmission returns 32 mpg city, 38 highway — closer to what you'd expect given the size of the car.
As you might expect, the Spark's fuel economy comes at the expense of performance. Its 1.2-liter four-cylinder engine produces 84 horsepower — enough to power this car adequately around town. Highway merging calls for a long on-ramp, lots of patience, or an empty highway. The spark in the Spark comes from style, not engine power.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Highmark’s insurance profit falls 40%
- Corbett: Coal is working
- Mastech Holdings records 51 percent profit jump in 1st quarter
- Drugmakers ready to carve out deals any way they can
- PNC’s CEO elected board chairman
- Young visionaries at PieceMaker Technologies Inc. see future in 3-D
- BNY Mellon notches $661M profit in 1st quarter
- ATI takes 1st-quarter loss, but says outlook is good
- McDonald’s profit slips amid weak sales
- ‘Old GM’ defense expected in court fight over faulty ignition switch
- AT&T joins crowded field with online video plans