Michael Baker names panel to review takeover offer, alternatives
Michael Baker Corp. named a committee of independent board members to review “strategic alternatives,” including a $24.25-a-share cash takeover offer from a private equity firm.
The Moon-based engineering and construction company said in a statement on Monday it has “not placed any limitations” on that review, and there's “no assurance (it) will pursue any particular course of action.”
Some shareholders and analysts criticized Baker for not performing or growing as much as its industry peers. Several CEOs have come and gone in recent years.
Shares have traded as low as about $18 in the past 12 months, averaging about $23.35. The stock closed on Monday at $24.90, up 45 cents.
“The offer is a premium to where the stock has been trading, but whether it's adequate, I don't know,” said John Rogers, an analyst at D.A. Davidson & Co. in Lake Oswego, Ore. It is “a healthy process” to have Baker's independent directors review the company's options, he said.
Baker employs 3,000 in 100 offices nationwide, including 725 in Western Pennsylvania.
In November, Baker's quarterly profit dropped to $700,000 versus $7.1 million a year earlier. Revenue rose to $145 million from $131 million, but $23 million of the increase was from the acquisition of a California engineering and planning company.
Tahira Afzal, an analyst at KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., New York, believes Baker is worth at least $27 a share, or about $3 more than the mid-December offer.
“It can be a standalone company, or it could merge with another company, as long as the board has a convincing plan,” Afzal said.
The takeover offer was made by DC Capital Partners of Alexandria, Va., which owns 5.2 percent of Baker. DC Capital proposes to merge Baker into KS International LL of McLean, Va., an engineering company that DC Capital controls.
Shareholder Crescendo Partners in New York sent the board a letter on Dec. 26 urging a sale. It and DC Capital Partners argue the company has underperformed and should seek alternatives.
Crescendo senior managing director Arnaud Ajdler believes Baker is trading “very, very low” relative to peers and is worth about $30 a share, he said in a recent interview.
Michael Baker CEO Bradley Mallory resigned Dec. 12 at the board's request. Two executives will lead Baker on an interim basis.
Mallory stepped in four years ago to replace Baker's interim CEO and longtime chairman, Richard Shaw, who assumed the CEO title for the fourth time upon the abrupt 2006 resignation of Dan Fusilli.
Baker's board needs to name a “strong replacement” soon, Afzal said. “The longer they wait, the more uncertainty it creates within the company and among clients.”
The board set no timetable to complete its strategic review, Baker spokesman David Higie said.
Thomas Olson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached a 412-320-7854 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Batteries key to alternative energy’s success
- As historic breakup nears, Alcoa works to redefine its ‘advantage’
- Paying pals digitally catches on
- Older workers try to cut back on hours at job
- Make green home upgrades pay off
- Program lets public service workers be forgiven for student debt
- Asian bug threatens oranges in Florida
- Travelers contend with increase in ground delays
- Black Friday chaos dwindles thanks to earlier deals, online sales
- Fuel cell standoff slows car technology’s rise in popularity
- Nimble Regal ready for winter with all-wheel drive