Plans altered for $22 million hotel at former auto site in Bloomfield
By Sam Spatter
Published: Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Changes in the original plans for a new hotel at the former Don Allen AutoCity site in Bloomfield were outlined Tuesday at the City Planning Commission.
The hotel project, estimated to cost $22 million, has been changed from the original plan described in March by developer Keith McGraw of Sewickley, a partner with Mark Laporte in Concord Hospitality Enterprises Co. of Raleigh, N.C.
McGraw said the hotel will be privately financed.
The current plan calls for a five-story, 128-room Hyatt House with 70 percent extended-stay rooms, consisting of a mix of room sizes, from studio to four two-bedrooms. The remaining rooms will be offer for daily use.
The original plan was for a six-story, 133-room Hilton Homewood Suites.
A final vote by the commission on the project will be held on Jan. 22, said Susan Tymoczko, city zoning administrator.
The site is an area bounded by Liberty and S. Aiken avenues, Baum Boulevard and South Atlantic Street.
An existing building, the old Don Allen showroom, will be demolished in February with a possible start of construction in spring. Completion is scheduled 15 months later, by summer 2014.
The hotel will include a retail area at one end. There will be 104 parking spaces on site, along with 43 bike racks.
McGraw said his development team has met with local neighborhood groups to explain the project.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Minorities crucial to filling Marcellus shale gas drilling jobs
- Harsh winter sets back Western Pa. maple harvest
- Diaper makers do due diligence
- Real estate goes techno
- CVS suit could be test case
- ‘Boomerang’ buyers get another chance at homeownership
- Prepaid cards start to elbow aside bank accounts
- Lab develops sponges for oil spill cleanup
- Encouraging employment report fails to stir much excitement to stock markets
- Demand grows for digital deal suppliers
- Samsung introduces free streaming radio service