Proposal would exempt family businesses from Pennsylvania inheritance tax
Until a few years ago, Dave Cranston Jr. had to worry about what would happen to his family's Robinson business if his father had died unexpectedly.
The state's inheritance tax can leave heirs scrambling to cover a tax bill. And many end up selling the business or taking out costly loans.
“If something were to happen suddenly to my father, there would have been tens of thousands of dollars of estate taxes owed,” said Dave Cranston Jr., president of Cranston Material Handling Equipment Corp. in Robinson. “None of us have that (money) sitting around waiting.”
Cranston owns 80 percent of the business founded by his grandfather in 1957, and his father is alive and well.
But a bill before Harrisburg lawmakers could end the worry for other family-owned companies across the state.
State Rep. Stephen Bloom, a Carlisle Republican, has introduced a proposal to exempt family-owned businesses from the state's inheritance tax, which can range from 4.5 percent to 15 percent of the total value of a business depending on whether the heir is a child, sibling or a distant relative.
Unlike the federal estate tax, which only applies to the value of an estate above $5 million, Pennsylvania's inheritance tax is based on the full value of the business.
“This has forced many families to sell off essential business resources just to pay the tax, and it forces some families to leave the business altogether,” Bloom said. “This is an unnecessary loss to our economy and our next generation of job creators.”
Cranston said his company isn't very big but it still has a “multi-million” dollar valuation. “It doesn't take much of a business to be worth a million,” he said.
The 4.5 percent tax, which applies to children inheriting from their parents, would mean a bill of $45,000 for every $1 million in business value. If it becomes law, the state Department of Revenue estimates it would lose tax revenue of $9.9 million in the 2013-14 fiscal year. The state passed a $27 billion budget last year.
Many companies take out insurance policies to cover an unexpected state tax bill, Cranston said.
Bloom said the bill he introduced this month is modeled after a proposal he introduced last year to exempt family-owned farms from the inheritance tax. A similar bill also was introduced in the Senate last year by Dominic Pileggi, a Chester Republican and the Senate Majority Leader.
The budget and tax deal signed into law last year by Gov. Tom Corbett included the exemption for family farms.
Pileggi also plans to push a Senate bill this year to exempt family firms from the state's inheritance tax.
“In far too many cases, the heirs to small companies cannot afford to pay the inheritance tax when the business owner dies, and they are forced to either liquidate the business's assets or sell the business,” he said.
Kevin Shivers, executive director of the Pennsylvania chapter of the National Federation of Independent Business, said the issue of repealing all or part of the inheritance tax is gaining momentum in Harrisburg.
“It has the greatest chance of being enacted it's had in the last 20 years,” Shivers said, citing Corbett's stand on eliminating the tax. He said many lawmakers are looking for any way to boost jobs in the state, he said.
“Everyone claims to want to help small business,” he said. “This particular proposal actually does help small business.”
Bloom's proposal, House bill 48, is scheduled to receive a hearing in the House Finance Committee next week.
Alex Nixon is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7928 or email@example.com.
Add Alex Nixon to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Agriculture prospects envisioned in Cuba
- Energy sector adjusts to global oil plummet
- ‘Staff Pick’ is golden ticket on Kickstarter
- Mind the time: Optimize last-minute shopping
- Kim Komando: Can you get a virus on your smartphone?
- Diane Stafford: Consider digital footprint
- 3 tips to use up health account funds
- Makers of wine corks have lost ground to screw tops
- Don’t stop job hunt in December
- EPA says it won’t regulate coal ash as hazardous waste
- ‘Cause for Paws’ telethon helps dogs find homes